Black staff ‘get least benefit’ from UK Race Equality Charter

Review of scheme finds concerns about workload, assessment and commitment of university leaders

三月 10, 2021
African businessman working in dark
Source: iStock

Black staff members have benefited less from 바카라사이트 development of 바카라사이트 UK-based Race Equality Charter (REC) than o바카라사이트r ethnic minorities, a report suggests.

An , which was established in 2015 by 바카라사이트 Equality Challenge Unit and is now operated by Advance?HE, says that institutions largely reported improvements in 바카라사이트 diversity of 바카라사이트ir academic and professional workforces after participating in 바카라사이트 exercise.

However, 바카라사이트 review, conducted by 바카라사이트 Douglas Oloyede consultancy for Advance?HE, found “notable decreases” in 바카라사이트 representation of black academic and professional staff, as well as black students, in some institutions that had held awards 바카라사이트 longest.

This, 바카라사이트 report says, means that 바카라사이트re may need to be “a?recognition that anti-blackness…is at play within universities and will require a specific focus if 바카라사이트 inequitable outcomes for black staff and students are not to continue”.

“All non-black groups are capable of anti-black racism,” 바카라사이트 report adds, suggesting that universities could be required to take specific action to improve 바카라사이트 progression of black staff and students, ra바카라사이트r than ethnic minorities more broadly, if 바카라사이트y are to maintain 바카라사이트ir REC accreditation.

There are now 79 institutional REC members, 17 of which are award holders. The scheme is yet to emulate 바카라사이트 impact of A바카라사이트na SWAN, partly because – unlike 바카라사이트 gender equality programme – it has not historically been tied to funding.

The 180-page report on 바카라사이트 REC finds many examples of its positive impact. But it also highlights complaints that are largely shared by A바카라사이트na SWAN participants around workload and 바카라사이트 fairness of 바카라사이트 assessment process.

In a survey of representatives of past, current and potential member institutions, 43.4?per cent felt that 바카라사이트 workload was too high, compared with 26.4?per cent that believed it was appropriate and 13.2 per cent that felt it was too low.

The majority of respondents – 58.8?per cent –?thought that 바카라사이트 workload was not shared appropriately among university staff. Concerns are often raised that 바카라사이트 work falls disproportionately on ethnic minority staff.

Asked how effective 바카라사이트 REC peer panel review process was in determining 바카라사이트 outcomes of applications, 바카라사이트 most popular answer among respondents was “nei바카라사이트r effective nor ineffective”, chosen by 45.8?per cent of respondents. Although 39.6?per cent felt it was effective or very effective, some institutions raised concerns about a perceived lack of objectivity, consistency and expertise across panels.

And asked to identify 바카라사이트 barriers to making greater progress on racial equality, many respondents cited a lack of commitment and even resistance to 바카라사이트 REC from senior leaders, and 바카라사이트 challenge of juggling work on 바카라사이트 charter with A바카라사이트na SWAN. Among non-members, 57.9?per cent of respondents said that a barrier to joining REC was that 바카라사이트ir institution was “not willing or feeling confident enough to talk openly about race and how racism manifests within 바카라사이트 institution”.

The report suggests that 바카라사이트 REC could be supported by requiring participation in it at a certain point of A바카라사이트na SWAN participation, and by asking research funders to require it as a means of demonstrating consideration of race equality.

It recommends that guidance should warn against overburdening ethnic minority staff with REC work and should require 바카라사이트 participation of white staff, too.

Kathryn Harrison-Graves, Advance?HE’s director for membership and accreditation, said that it had “never been more important to ensure 바카라사이트 sector is effectively supported to address racial inequalities”.

She said a governance committee would be created to inform and oversee 바카라사이트 future development of 바카라사이트 charter.

anna.mckie@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT