Following Freud

三月 10, 1995

In Frederick Crews's splendid article (바카라 사이트 추천S, March 3) dealing with 바카라사이트 responses to his attack on Freud, he comments that his original essay continues to attract more attention than all of his previous writings combined.

I suspect Professor Crews is being unduly modest - surely his The Pooh Perplex (Arthur Barker, 1963) containing 바카라사이트 critique "A. A. Milne's Honey-Ballon-Pit-Gun-Tail-Bathtub complex" did not go unnoticed by 바카라사이트 Freudians? In that essay ("written" by Karl Anschauung, MD) is 바카라사이트 statement "The present disadvantage of A. A. Milne's absence from my office, will not hamper us if we in mind keep 바카라사이트 realisation, that works of art are under conditions of relaxed superego censorship written, thus (also) yielding formerly repressed patterns almost as successfully, as private analytical sessions, lacking however 바카라사이트 stimulating incentives of transference and very high fees". We should be grateful to Professor Crew for his consistent debunking of Freudian psychoanalysis over 바카라사이트 past 30 years.

TERRY BENNETT

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology

Queen's Medical Centre

Nottingham

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT