In Frederick Crews's splendid article (바카라 사이트 추천S, March 3) dealing with 바카라사이트 responses to his attack on Freud, he comments that his original essay continues to attract more attention than all of his previous writings combined.
I suspect Professor Crews is being unduly modest - surely his The Pooh Perplex (Arthur Barker, 1963) containing 바카라사이트 critique "A. A. Milne's Honey-Ballon-Pit-Gun-Tail-Bathtub complex" did not go unnoticed by 바카라사이트 Freudians? In that essay ("written" by Karl Anschauung, MD) is 바카라사이트 statement "The present disadvantage of A. A. Milne's absence from my office, will not hamper us if we in mind keep 바카라사이트 realisation, that works of art are under conditions of relaxed superego censorship written, thus (also) yielding formerly repressed patterns almost as successfully, as private analytical sessions, lacking however 바카라사이트 stimulating incentives of transference and very high fees". We should be grateful to Professor Crew for his consistent debunking of Freudian psychoanalysis over 바카라사이트 past 30 years.
TERRY BENNETT
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology
Queen's Medical Centre
Nottingham
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 바카라 사이트 추천 šs university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?