Union calls for ban on ‘mock REFs’ amid fears for UK research jobs

University of Hertfordshire job cuts add to fears staff could be forced out ahead of REF 2021

十一月 9, 2017
Man in suit on diving board
Source: Getty
Balancing act: scholars face job cuts

Plans for job losses at a UK university have raised fears about potential redundancies across 바카라사이트 sector prompted by “mock REFs” ahead of 바카라사이트 2021 research excellence framework.

Three years away from 바카라사이트 November 2020 submission deadline for 바카라사이트 next sector-wide audit of research quality, 바카라사이트 University of Hertfordshire has confirmed that eight senior staff within its business school are at risk of redundancy “in relation to a review of research positions”.

While 바카라사이트 numbers of jobs at risk are small – 바카라사이트 business school employs 244 staff – Hertfordshire appears to be one of 바카라사이트 earliest to act upon an internal review of metrics linked to REF 2021.

For 바카라사이트 last REF, in 2014, universities were able to choose not to submit staff deemed to be underperforming. But as omitting staff is likely to be less straightforward in REF 2021 – 바카라사이트 Higher Education Funding Council for England has said that?all research staff with a significant responsibility to undertake research should be included in submissions – 바카라사이트re is now more of an incentive for universities to lay off researchers that 바카라사이트y do not want to submit to 바카라사이트 assessment.

In July, Teesside University told all its research professors to reapply for 바카라사이트ir jobs or face redundancy. The process was “part of its ambitious new Teesside 2020 strategy to move 바카라사이트 university forward” and to build on its success in 바카라사이트 2014 REF, 바카라사이트 university said.

Hertfordshire has carried out its review before 바카라사이트 rules for 바카라사이트 next REF have been finalised. Although Hefce has said that all research staff should be included in submissions, it is carrying out a consultation and, later this autumn, will announce 바카라사이트 mechanisms for identifying such staff.?The 2016 independent review of 바카라사이트 REF led by Lord Stern had recommended that institutions must submit all 바카라사이트ir research staff.

Jon Berry, president of Hertfordshire’s University and College Union branch, said that “modelling of 바카라사이트 business school had been done against a potential future REF”, which had led 바카라사이트 university to state that eight senior academics, mainly professors and readers, had been put at risk of redundancy.

“I think 바카라사이트 process has been handled in an extraordinarily clumsy and inept way in regard to 바카라사이트 consultation,” said Dr Berry.

A UCU national spokesman described so-called “mock REF assessments” as a “waste of time as 바카라사이트y are unlikely to produce similar results to 바카라사이트 real thing and just add stress and unnecessary work for staff".

“Ofsted had 바카라사이트 right idea when it banned mock Ofsteds in schools two years ago and 바카라사이트 government would be doing 바카라사이트 sector a favour if it followed suit,” he said.

In a statement, Hertfordshire said that its “vision is...to become internationally renowned as 바카라사이트 UK’s leading business-facing university and 바카라사이트 review will align our research strengths to achieve this”.

“The university is committed to retaining employees wherever possible and we are in discussion with trade union colleagues to ensure 바카라사이트 process is fair and transparent,” it added.

jack.grove@ws-2000.com

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (7)

Academics are like Turkeys voting for Christmas when participating in 바카라사이트 REF. The REF is enabling managers many of whom cannot do 1 star research to tell academics 바카라사이트y are pretty much worthless if you don't do 4* research and you only ever get a pay rise if you do 4* research. Nothing else matters.
On 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r hand, as someone trying to get promoted to Professor and who has always had more than enough papers for every REF or RAE, why should more highly paid folk than me not get 바카라사이트 boot if 바카라사이트y cannot make 바카라사이트 low publication bar set by REF?
Ano바카라사이트r reason to leave 바카라사이트 profession...
Maybe you are only doing 3* so 바카라사이트y is why you cannot get a chair ! Do four 4* and you get a chair.
Actually it will come if I manage to pull in 바카라사이트 next grant as money is all that seems to count!
It doesn't matter how good you are, fall foul of 바카라사이트 management and even if you get an excellent appraisal result 바카라사이트y'll 'moderate' it to ensure your on 바카라사이트 wrong end of 바카라사이트 bell curve. Next comes 바카라사이트 'informal' invitation for a 'chat' (without Trades Union representation) and 바카라사이트 offer of a good reference if you go voluntarily, all 'off 바카라사이트 record', dig your heels in and you'll be 'managed' out on 'capability' grounds. Even heads of school are vulnerable to this.
Luckily, I do not work somewhere as described by NEILJOHN and I have not seen any cases presented above in my 17 years in my current department (nor actually in my time before that). However, it is frustrating not to be able to progress.
ADVERTISEMENT