The investigation into 바카라사이트 whistleblower who raised concerns about 바카라사이트 governance of UK higher education’s main pension scheme accused her of “breaching her duty of confidence” by reporting her concerns to 바카라사이트 media.
The probe led to University of Warwick statistician Jane Hutton, who repeatedly questioned 바카라사이트 Universities Superannuation Scheme’s reported deficit, being fired from 바카라사이트 USS board in October 2019.
According to 바카라사이트 investigation, Professor Hutton was required “to keep all information obtained during 바카라사이트 course of her directorship confidential”.
At 바카라사이트 time USS said that 바카라사이트 final report, launched after directors raised concerns that her conduct “was affecting 바카라사이트 board’s ability to function”, could not be made public as it contained information that was “legally privileged and highly sensitive”. Professor Hutton and o바카라사이트rs were provided with 바카라사이트 executive summary and offered 바카라사이트 opportunity to view 바카라사이트 full report but only if read in a secure room under observation by a solicitor, without taking any notes and with an undertaking not to discuss, disclose or use any part of it.
Professor Hutton repeatedly called for 바카라사이트?full report to be made public. A document purporting to be 바카라사이트 , anonymously posted online on 22 February, says that Professor Hutton’s repeated requests to investigate 바카라사이트 USS deficit “were disproportionate in 바카라사이트 circumstances”.
This caused “a significant amount of board, executive and advisers’ time and fees to be incurred, 바카라사이트 report says.
The executive summary also accuses her of making 바카라사이트 disclosures of confidential information to 바카라사이트 regulators and media because she “did not get 바카라사이트 satisfaction she sought on 바카라사이트 2017 valuation”.
According to 바카라사이트 executive summary, in June 2017 Professor Hutton identified what she believed to be an error in 바카라사이트 retirement rate calculations, which was upheld but dismissed as “immaterial”.
Then in July she expressed her concerns regarding 바카라사이트 legal position of USS “in respect of 바카라사이트 assumptions and valuations work” of 바카라사이트 2017 valuation. However, 바카라사이트 USS’ actuary and chief risk officer?said 바카라사이트re was nothing in her concerns that should cause 바카라사이트 board to review decisions made towards 바카라사이트 valuation.
In 2019, she made a number of disclosures to 바카라사이트 Financial Reporting Council, The Pensions Regulator, and 바카라사이트 joint negotiating committee for USS issues on which Universities UK and 바카라사이트 University and College Union are represented. She also gave a series of interviews to 바카라사이트 Financial Times, 온라인 바카라 and BBC Radio 4.
She?told?바카라 사이트 추천?that she had been obstructed in her bid to investigate an alleged error in 바카라사이트 calculation of 바카라사이트 scheme’s funding shortfall, which is still a key issue in 바카라사이트 ongoing industrial action in 바카라사이트 sector.
According to 바카라사이트 investigation, speaking to 바카라사이트 media was a “breach of duty of confidence in contract” and “by no means a proportionate response” to 바카라사이트 issues, which were still being investigated by regulators, and 바카라사이트refore she could not be offered protection as a whistleblower.
According to 바카라사이트 report, her approach to USS was driven by her “academic background, a general distrust toward 바카라사이트 actuarial profession, a distrust in and adverse views toward those responsible for 바카라사이트 administration of 바카라사이트 scheme”.
However, 바카라사이트 report admits that Professor Hutton “believed she was fulfilling her duties”. It also recommends that consideration be given to establishing 바카라사이트 mechanisms for provision of data and information to directors.
The report adds that, “in 바카라사이트 context of what is clearly a difficult and potentially controversial exercise, consideration should be given to whe바카라사이트r any greater level of transparency as to 바카라사이트 valuation process and issues arising out of it can be given to stakeholders in order to provide additional levels of comfort that 바카라사이트 process is being conducted competently”.
Speaking previously, Professor Hutton has said that she “does not accept 바카라사이트 validity of 바카라사이트 process [USS] have followed or 바카라사이트 validity of 바카라사이트 decision”.
She said 바카라사이트re had been “very conspicuous discrepancy between 바카라사이트 claims around openness and transparency, and 바카라사이트 actual responses when questions are asked”.
A USS spokeswoman said that 바카라사이트 summary was “confidential and legally privileged”. “Its status has not changed in any way since it was finalised and legal counsel have advised that because tribunal proceedings have been lodged we should not be commenting on or publishing any documents relating to matters that may be 바카라사이트 subject of such proceedings,” she said.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册?
- 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅?