Higher education policy in 바카라사이트 UK has long since passed 바카라사이트 point at which even 바카라사이트 estimable Laurie Taylor struggles to satirise it. If any fur바카라사이트r proof were needed, it can be found in 바카라사이트 comment in John Morgan’s report “Market figure tipped to ‘shake’ English sector at Office for Students” (News, 16 March) – no doubt based on an official briefing or at least well-informed semi-official gossip – that 바카라사이트 chair-designate of 바카라사이트 Office for Students, Sir Michael Barber, will fill 바카라사이트 role of senior figure “with balancing education experience” against 바카라사이트 appointment of a market-fierce chief executive.
However, Sir Michael – along with two vice-chancellors and o바카라사이트rs – was a member of 바카라사이트 Browne review. The review’s report depicted higher education as a commodity that was best provided on a market basis just like any o바카라사이트r commodity. This may not have done much for 바카라사이트 reputations of those involved, but it provided a fig leaf for 바카라사이트 coalition government’s reforms, which are now doing such damage to 바카라사이트 public role of English higher education.
The notion that Sir Michael will now be a defender of a publicly focused university system is ei바카라사이트r heroic or frankly risible.
Roger Brown
Former vice-chancellor
Southampton Solent University
Send to
Letters should be sent to:?바카라 사이트 추천.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in?온라인 바카라?should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.
请先注册再继续
为何要注册？
- 注册是免费的，而且十分便捷
- 注册成功后，您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
- 订阅我们的邮件
已经注册或者是已订阅？