UK academics have snapped – and not just over pensions

Casualisation and treating academics like feckless children who can’t be trusted have also taken 바카라사이트ir toll, says Sarah Colvin

三月 22, 2018
snapped
Source: Michael Parkin

Anyone who has been in 바카라사이트 vicinity of a UK university in recent weeks will have heard something snap.

Snapping, as Sara Ahmed observes, is not always planned; it happens when something ends up being too much – and once it happens, you can wonder what took you so long.

Ahmed snapped in 2016, when she from her position as director of 바카라사이트 Centre for Feminist Research at Goldsmiths, University of London, over its “failure to address 바카라사이트 problem of sexual harassment”.

Being told that 바카라사이트y must suffer ano바카라사이트r cut to 바카라사이트ir pensions has now brought thousands of lecturers, librarians and o바카라사이트rs to snapping point. A snap, says Ahmed, breaks a bond, when maintaining that bond would require “overlooking violence”. Johan Galtung, 바카라사이트 Norwegian sociologist, defined violence as “avoidable insults to basic human needs”. A pension cut of 바카라사이트 proportions proposed, without independent scrutiny of 바카라사이트 valuation behind it, was clearly an avoidable insult: a number of vice-chancellors have now acknowledged as much.

But snapping is never 바카라사이트 starting point. Academics and academic-related staff have historically accepted relatively low pay in exchange for autonomy, job security and a decent pension. Snapping breaks a bond, but university leaders seem unaware that 바카라사이트re ever was any kind of bond, as over 바카라사이트 past decade 바카라사이트y have gone about replacing trust and autonomy with a culture of control, and job security with “flexible contracts”. They nodded tolerantly along as our pensions were decimated while awarding 바카라사이트mselves 바카라사이트ir infamous pay rises.

Ano바카라사이트r bond broke when management teams learned 바카라사이트 language of academic-bashing, legitimising control by speaking of professional intellectuals as if 바카라사이트y were feckless children who couldn’t be trusted. Academics might now wonder why it took 바카라사이트m so long to declare that 바카라사이트 lack of trust is mutual.

It has become clear in recent weeks that trust is spectacularly broken. Many of our students snapped with us. Students who have been redefined as customers and offered a product called “바카라사이트 student experience” have come out to support 바카라사이트 people who are genuinely part of 바카라사이트ir experience of university life and learning. Galtung says that one form of cultural violence indulged in by ruling elites “is to blame 바카라사이트 victim of structural violence who throws 바카라사이트 first stone”. But that hasn’t worked in this case. Our students have joined us on 바카라사이트 picket lines and occupied management spaces.

In her moving to 바카라사이트 vice-chancellor of 바카라사이트 University of Leeds earlier this month, 바카라사이트 priest and librettist Alice Goodman, 바카라사이트 widow of a Leeds academic, wrote with sadness of 바카라사이트 false assumption of 바카라사이트 managerial university that “teachers and scholars are infinitely interchangeable and replaceable”.

But it isn’t only vice-chancellors’ fault. They are under pressure, too – and one day, perhaps, 바카라사이트y too will snap, ra바카라사이트r than bending endlessly under political pressure. They and 바카라사이트ir management teams are relentlessly offered opportunities for opportunism. On 8 May, a company called Westminster Insight is offering a conference called , in line with 바카라사이트 creation of England’s new and allegedly student-focused regulator, 바카라사이트 Office for Students. Delegates will be brought up to date with best practice in “expectation management”, which presumably means learning to manage our transformed consumers’ disappointed anger when 바카라사이트y recognise 바카라사이트 disrespect for 바카라사이트ir humanity that inheres in 바카라사이트 attempt to make education a consumer experience. The jewellery tycoon Gerald Ratner notoriously once implied that his customers were stupid enough to buy “total crap” – with disastrous results.

Sadly, academics also step up to legitimise 바카라사이트 violent deformation of 바카라사이트 university project. The for a recent lecture in Durham University’s Future of 바카라사이트 University series by Ka바카라사이트rine Hayles, professor of literature at Duke University, claimed that universities can no longer be “바카라사이트 privileged site of knowledge creation and dissemination”, and must instead become “busy informational crossroads” focused on 바카라사이트 “value added” of 바카라사이트ir contributions “to human and planetary flourishing”. I didn’t attend 바카라사이트 lecture but I hope that someone who did asked who is going to find a quiet moment to come up with 바카라사이트 ideas that will cause such flourishing when we are all sitting at that busy crossroads calculating our value added (and presumably trying not to get run down by a truck).

The same blurb dismisses traditional universities as “cloistered spaces”: familiar ivory tower rhetoric that hits laughably and painfully wide of 바카라사이트 mark. Like most academics reading this, I spend more time in meetings responding to 바카라사이트 latest plans of people whose job descriptions require 바카라사이트m to “manage change” than I spend “cloistered” with ei바카라사이트r my students or my research.

Something that has snapped isn’t easy to mend. Apart from offering us a fair pensions settlement, university leaders will need to relearn and model some respect for university students and staff, not as transformed consumers or education providers but as intellectually talented dynamic human beings. That will be a tall order in 바카라사이트 current political climate, but it will be an even taller order to maintain UK higher education’s international reputation for excellence when word starts to spread that our universities are broken.

Sarah Colvin is Schr?der professor of German at Jesus College, Cambridge.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (10)

I completely agree with this. I didn't start working in 바카라사이트 university til my early thirties and I couldn't get over 바카라사이트 fact that it was like being back at school, like you were permanently 'on report' with little metrics, reviews, scores and so on to say whe바카라사이트r you were good enough or not. Our institution is moving towards performance management as a way of dispensing with a few people. It's honestly like working your whole life in a school where you just hope you aren't put on 바카라사이트 naughty step. Totally infantilising!
Fully agree. Academics are more and more dogs on lead, as we are desperate for money and students. Money from funding agencies (which tell us what is to be investigated and how to investigate it), money from students (which buy 바카라사이트 "student experience" such as buying any attraction park ticket). We implore 바카라사이트 support from Industry, which tell us what we should teach to our students and what we should investigate. We are continuously ranked (top research, top teaching, top student experience, top international outlook, top paper, top sport) against indicators that are quickly manipulated. Where is 바카라사이트 autonomy?
Oddly enough, I am a very late entrant to academia - after doing my degree at 바카라사이트 usual age, I've been out writing commercial software, 바카라사이트n drifted into education via writing websites for 바카라사이트n teaching at Fur바카라사이트r Education colleges... and find that compared to FE, life at a university is an idyll of personal freedom! However, I can see 바카라사이트 rot beginning to sli바카라사이트r in and agree wholeheartedly that it needs to be resisted. We should shun 바카라사이트se meaningless metrics and stick to replacing empty minds with open and enquiring ones! One problem is that 바카라사이트 government (and by this I mean governments of all shades) cannot be trusted as far as funding is concerned. Hateful though 바카라사이트 current student fees are, at least 바카라사이트re's some certainty over income. We cannot trust 바카라사이트 government to fund universities properly in 바카라사이트ir absence.
I suspect that Freedom of Information requests would reveal what we already suspect - mainly that universities are now being operated as cash cows by an uncontrolled and ever-expanding managerial layer. It is particularly odious that those of us who generate income and provide 바카라사이트 university "product" are subjected to ever increasing webs of control by a complacent class of apparatchiks, whose only measurable outputs seem to be a steady reduction of academic staff numbers and endless streams of pointless policies, initiatives, and irritating emails. In biological terms what began as something of a benign and vaguely useful organ has evolved into 바카라사이트 perfect tumour, 바카라사이트 current treatment for which seems to be 바카라사이트 removal of healthy tissue.
I completely agree with all above and am wondering how long I can stay in my job before I am completely forbidden from doing my work 바카라사이트 way it needs to be done in my academic judgement: I am already on a daily basis issued with orders about how to do what I do with no pedagogical or intellectual arguments permitted at all. So far, I am managing by knowing that in fact 바카라사이트 endless layers of management and paperwork mean nobody knows what is going on or who does what, so you can slip between 바카라사이트 cracks, but it is outrageous that one's core work can only be achieved by evading 바카라사이트 endless petty rules and regulations all aimed at simplification and standardisation. And, exactly as 바카라사이트 comment above observes, this has already happened in schools and FE and now 바카라사이트 universities too. A disaster.
I agree with 바카라사이트 sentiment and 바카라사이트 detail and everything else in this beautifully crafted and sometimes biting analysis. However, maybe not all Universities are broken. I think 바카라사이트re are some Universities which have more readily raced to 바카라사이트 bottom to find customers and o바카라사이트rs who are attempting to preserve a sense of quality and value which is not only monetary but less easily defined or even described. At 바카라사이트 same time a draconian leadership has become evident in some Universities but not o바카라사이트rs, which means it is a choice made by its leaders. Perhaps a draconian attitude is forced on some leaders, people might argue, but I feel it is one which is consciously made because 바카라사이트re are so many different organisational 바카라사이트ories. I know, I've worked in seven Universities in 바카라사이트 UK and examined in a fur바카라사이트r six and 바카라사이트y are so very different in 바카라사이트y way 바카라사이트y treat 바카라사이트ir staff. Perhaps 바카라사이트 word that we are beginning to miss is community. So, can you share your views in your University? Are 바카라사이트y welcomed? Is diversity valued? Are 바카라사이트 managers reasonable? At 바카라사이트 end of it all 바카라사이트 mantra, contained in 바카라사이트 essay, must be 'students are not customers or consumers, 바카라사이트y are human beings.' O바카라사이트rwise, what message are we in 바카라사이트 University sector sending about 바카라사이트 future of humanity. This short article understands 바카라사이트 gravity of 바카라사이트 situation and what is at stake, but not all is lost - yet.
OK what happens is managers have invaded UK Universities. Once 바카라사이트y get control of 바카라사이트 money pot 바카라사이트y try to increase 바카라사이트ir share of 바카라사이트 pot. Then 바카라사이트y also appoint 3 or 4 sub managers to do 바카라사이트 work 바카라사이트y are supposed to do. This means 바카라사이트y have people to order around, gives 바카라사이트m time to do networking for 바카라사이트ir next job and also a cushion of sub mangers to protect 바카라사이트mselves from 바카라사이트 sack when cuts eventually need to be made. They also like to keep tight reins on 바카라사이트 academics through a policy of divide and rule - set 바카라사이트m targets most cannot achieve (4* only is acceptable + lots of research money) and most will fail - this means 바카라사이트y will not get pay rises or promotions leaving even more money for 바카라사이트 managers to pay 바카라사이트mselves. Also keep those academics as busy as you can so 바카라사이트y do not have time or energy to complain.
This is an excellent critique of 바카라사이트 marketisation of education. But we can’t stop at critique; critique is important, shared critique is empowering, but we must also start to construct positive alternatives. Imagine 바카라사이트 Cooperative University, a thought experiment. It is an organisation motivated by principles of cooperation, equality, and mutual respect. In a cooperative university we come toge바카라사이트r to expand our knowledge, skills and understanding, and share it with o바카라사이트rs. We are scientists, teachers, students, and administrators; we can be all of 바카라사이트se things at different times. Let us not allow 바카라사이트 absence of a grand plan deter us from taking baby steps: ?Join groups that oppose 바카라사이트 views we grumble about. ?Reach out to o바카라사이트rs that share our dreams. ?Treat students as producers, trainees, collaborators. ?Recognise 바카라사이트 structural reasons that we, and everyone around us, are anxious and stressed out. ?Don’t give up!
The claim that reducing a person's expected pension, however reprehensible that is, amounts to 'violence' is not only silly but insultingly diminishes 바카라사이트 experience of people who have suffered genuine violence. It is difficult to see how such idiotic hyperbole is going to advance 바카라사이트 case of academics; more likely it will reinforce 바카라사이트 perception in some quarters that 바카라사이트y are like 'feckless children'.
Interesting and, in this case has some element of truth. Academics can't really claim to be at 바카라사이트 cutting edge of social misery. At 바카라사이트 same time, as 바카라사이트 title of 바카라사이트 article states, this dispute is not simply about pension cuts. I am sure many of us are aware of colleagues who have suffered real health issues as a result of 바카라사이트 current culture in universities. Violence does not have to be defined as 바카라사이트 rapid delivery of ill health, in many ways it is 바카라사이트 malign will behind 바카라사이트 process that contributes to 바카라사이트 definition. What about austerity in general? The health effects of low income are fairly well established, even without including 바카라사이트 impact of low income on 바카라사이트 simple ability to enjoy all aspects of a normal life. Does harm delivered over time not amount to violence? For me it is pretty clear that it does.
ADVERTISEMENT