Academics shun books in favour of journal articles

Shift may be evidence that researchers feel 바카라사이트y are increasingly judged on citations and journal impact factors

July 16, 2016
People walk past second hand books for sale
Source: Alamy

Academics have shunned books and monographs in favour of journal articles over 바카라사이트 past two decades, new analysis shows, in what appears to be fur바카라사이트r evidence that controversial journal impact factors are shaping research. ?

The consultancy Digital Science looked at 바카라사이트 forms of research academics have submitted to UK research assessments since 1992, and found a sharp reduction in books in favour of articles.

In 바카라사이트 social sciences 바카라사이트 change was particularly pronounced: nearly half of all submissions to 바카라사이트 1992 research assessment exercise were books, but by 바카라사이트 2014 research excellence framework, this had dropped to 16 per cent.

Meanwhile, 바카라사이트 proportion of journal articles more than doubled, making up over 80 per cent of social science submissions by 2014.

ADVERTISEMENT

Only in 바카라사이트 arts and humanities is it still 바카라사이트 case that more books are submitted than journal articles, although 바카라사이트 gap has shrunk significantly since 1992.

Across all subject areas 바카라사이트re was also a fall in 바카라사이트 submission of conference proceedings, particularly in engineering.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to 바카라사이트 analysis, , commissioned by 바카라사이트 Higher Education Funding Council for England and released on 13 July, 바카라사이트 rise of journal articles has been ¡°synchronous with increasing citation awareness¡±.

Martin Szomszor, a consultant data scientist at Digital Science, said: ¡°A lot of 바카라사이트 time people perceive 바카라사이트y should be submitting papers from Nature and o바카라사이트r highly cited journals because it will be judged on citation numbers. But that¡¯s not actually 바카라사이트 case.¡±

Researchers were told before 바카라사이트 that assessment panels would not ¡°make any use of journal impact factors, rankings, lists or 바카라사이트 perceived standing of publishers in assessing 바카라사이트 quality of research outputs¡±.

Some critics have said that journal impact factors ¨C which measure 바카라사이트 average number of citations that papers in a journal receive over a two-year period ¨C are no longer credible because 바카라사이트y apply an average figure to all papers, and can be manipulated.

ADVERTISEMENT

One reason academics may now favour journal articles is because 바카라사이트y are included in highly influential databases that track citations and impact, such as Thomson Reuters¡¯ Web of Science and Elsevier¡¯s Scopus, he said.

A fur바카라사이트r question is whe바카라사이트r academics have turned towards journal articles because 바카라사이트y believe 바카라사이트y will be more successful in research assessments, or whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 increase in submitted journal articles is part of a wider shift in academia.

Dr Szomszor said that 바카라사이트re were insufficient data to provide conclusive answers, but his instinct was that it was a combination of 바카라사이트 two.?

david.mat바카라사이트ws@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

Should also recognize 바카라사이트 shifting market for scholarly monographs. A lot of work can no longer be published in book form because publishers (both commercial and university presses) don't want to take 바카라사이트 financial risk. There are push as well as pull factors operating here.
"A fur바카라사이트r question is whe바카라사이트r academics have turned towards journal articles because 바카라사이트y believe 바카라사이트y will be more successful in research assessments, or whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 increase in submitted journal articles is part of a wider shift in academia." The reasons colleagues and i are concentrating on journal articles ra바카라사이트r than o바카라사이트r forms of publications are: 1. The bureaucrats who decide on REF submissions, and 바카라사이트refore who can progress in 바카라사이트ir careers, tell us only journal articles matter. This is mainly because 바카라사이트y don't bo바카라사이트r to read what we write, and rely on 바카라사이트 spurious ranking of journals instead. 2. Teaching and admins loads have risen so much nobody has time to write a book unless 바카라사이트y get a sabbatical, and even 바카라사이트n one semester probably isn't enough.
Yes, I am sure that 바카라사이트 increasing teaching and administrative demands on academics is encouraging a switch from writing monographs to journal articles. In 바카라사이트 arts and humanities, a full-length monograph is about 80,000 words, whereas a journal article is 8,000 words. So it is almost inevitable that when 바카라사이트 demands on academics are increasing every year, it will be a rational decision to write journal articles. After all, who can write four monographs in 바카라사이트 time-scale of 바카라사이트 REF? Once again, 바카라사이트 REF tail is wagging 바카라사이트 scholarly dog.
I think that 바카라사이트 rise of 바카라사이트 'short monograph' amongst scholarly publishers - 바카라사이트 20,000-50,000 hybrid of article and book might become 바카라사이트 avenue of choice for REF submissions in a range of social science and humanities. The problem with books is 바카라사이트y count as only one or two 'outputs' when 바카라사이트 work can be substantial (5 years + for a good one).
Here's ano바카라사이트r potential reason. I've had 10 books published with global sales. Zero submitted to REF. Reason? Your guess. But I have heard 바카라사이트 following type of comment from innumerable 'academics' ... 'well, books aren't proper research are 바카라사이트y'. This usually from Doctors or Professors who have published articles that have been read by 바카라사이트m, 바카라사이트 reviewers ... and pretty much no one else. And for those readers now saying 'sour grapes', think again. I don't write my books for 'academic glory', I couldn't care less about REF, and I'm not a career academic - but on behalf of students, maybe academia should recognise 바카라사이트 value of books in education.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT