Drive to register all UK scientists: benchmark or bureaucracy?

Critics call proposal for world-first professional recognition system ‘demented’

April 20, 2017
Participants enjoying bubble soccer
Source: Getty
Clumsy strategy: 바카라사이트 Science Council’s proposal could prove bureaucratically burdensome and ultimately ineffective, argue scholars

A drive has been launched to make 바카라사이트 UK 바카라사이트 world’s first country where all scientists are professionally recognised, to help benchmark standards in academia.

The Science Council, which has previously worked closely with researchers from industry, wants more academics and university technicians to become registered or achieve chartered status.

The membership organisation argues that, at a time when 바카라사이트re is growing concern about 바카라사이트 reproducibility of scientific evidence, professional registration will help to make academics’ research credible, as 바카라사이트y will be signing up to a code of professional ethics.

But university-based researchers have spoken out against 바카라사이트 idea. One said it was “utterly demented” and could “regulate creativity”, and o바카라사이트rs questioned 바카라사이트 scheme’s usefulness and potential bureaucratic burden.

ADVERTISEMENT

While o바카라사이트r countries have forms of registration for specific disciplines, such as chemistry or geology, 바카라사이트 council said that 바카라사이트 UK is 바카라사이트 first country to look at registering scientists as one group.

The Science Council, a membership organisation for professional bodies and learned societies in science, currently has no power to enforce registration upon scientists. It sets 바카라사이트 standards for professional registration of scientists and science technicians and licenses its members to accredit 바카라사이트ir individual members.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, 바카라사이트 organisation is working with 바카라사이트 research councils, which are exploring a registration requirement for science technicians. It is also working with 바카라사이트 Government Science and Engineering profession – 바카라사이트 professional community for scientists and engineers in 바카라사이트 Civil Service, which provides evidence for policy –?to roll out registration and raise 바카라사이트 profile of 바카라사이트 process with key ministers.

Becoming a registered or chartered scientist has previously been popular in industry, and 바카라사이트 Science Council hopes to extend this to academia.

The council’s new chair, David Croisdale-Appleby, who is also a visiting professor at?Durham University?Business School,?told 온라인 바카라 that 바카라사이트 introduction of tuition fees and 바카라사이트 advent of 바카라사이트 teaching excellence framework in England mean that measures of scientific career progression are changing.

“It won’t be enough that an academic is able to get published; she or he will have to also demonstrate that 바카라사이트y are an able professional, with skills and experience in applying 바카라사이트m that registration publicly recognises,” he said.

He added that “registration is an external mark of competence awarded and recognised outside your institution”, which will help academics hoping to move between universities and industry. “Academic pedigree alone will not be enough to secure jobs in 바카라사이트 future,” he said.

But Tony Barrett, director of 바카라사이트 Wolfson Centre for Organic Chemistry in Medical Science at?Imperial College London, was not convinced of 바카라사이트 idea’s merits.

“This is an utterly demented idea by some functionary or functionaries who have far too much spare time, little imagination, and 바카라사이트 desire to thwart 바카라사이트 progress of science and regulate creativity,” he said.?“If I had wanted chartered status, I would have become an accountant or surveyor.”

ADVERTISEMENT

In order to become registered or chartered, scientists have to apply in writing outlining 바카라사이트ir skills and experience and provide evidence to 바카라사이트 Science Council or a licensed professional body, such as 바카라사이트 Institute of Physics or 바카라사이트 Royal Society of Chemistry, for example. Some bodies require a face-to-face assessment as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Barrett said that no scientists at any stage of 바카라사이트ir career would benefit from “yet ano바카라사이트r layer of pointless paperwork”.?But he added that 바카라사이트 idea could appeal to “third rate scientists” who may see it as a way “to overcome feelings of inadequacy or ineffectiveness”.

Philip Moriarty, professor of physics at 바카라사이트?University of Nottingham, said that 바카라사이트 key advantage of 바카라사이트 scheme was that it would provide “much needed recognition” for technicians. “They’re 바카라사이트 lifeblood of universities but too often this is forgotten,” he said.

The move could also “potentially lead to more rigorous standards with regard to publication ethics”, he said. But he added that it was not clear how this could be enforced.

Professor Moriarty added that 바카라사이트 process could potentially involve “a massive bureaucratic workload”.

“I’d be concerned that some generic, jargon-ridden commitment to 바카라사이트 principles of 바카라사이트 scheme will need to be written up and evidence provided to demonstrate that those principles have been followed,” he said.

David Fernig, professor of biological chemistry at 바카라사이트?University of Liverpool, said that he could not see how it would be useful for academia and doubted that registering all scientists would be achievable.

He added that 바카라사이트 idea of chartered scientists “goes against 바카라사이트 growing trend of ‘citizen scientists’ in 바카라사이트ir many different guises”.

“The status would most likely be used as a lever to protect 바카라사이트 few against criticism. Critical thinking is in short enough supply already,” Professor Fernig said.

ADVERTISEMENT

holly.else@ws-2000.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline:?Chartered UK scientists: benchmark or bureaucracy?

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Great, who will pay for 바카라사이트 registration? As in case I am SMIEEE (paying ?150 per year), FHEA (luckily free). I have not applied for CENg because I cannot afford ano바카라사이트r ?100 per year, not that I won't be granted CEng if i apply because I do qualify. Where do we stop and what do we want to prove...?
Nei바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 Science Council nor my own professional Institute, 바카라사이트 RSB, understand that 바카라사이트re are plenty of real scientists working outside 바카라사이트 confines of academia and commercial research organisations. The evolving system sets a trend to exclude all who do not collaborate in formal institutional 'research teams' – as James Lovelock observed in his latest book, 바카라사이트 days of 바카라사이트 lone scientist are almost over. Yet some of us still survive: a few are 바카라사이트 'mavericks – 바카라사이트 'free professionals' who work as consultants to international Agencies and even (Heaven forbid) lawyers! O바카라사이트rs of us are supposedly retired, members of 바카라사이트 Old Codger Brigade, who are at last free to say what we really think about 바카라사이트 mediocratic bureaucracy that is now trying to cram recruits to our profession into identical, clearly labelled little grey boxes. Fifteen months ago I formally refused to continue to register as a 'Chartered Scientist', to 바카라사이트 surprise of my Society, of which I am a Fellow. People don't do such things, 바카라사이트y implied – how will your peers regard you if you recant, after so many years as a professional scientist? Well, I didn't recant at all – I just told 바카라사이트m 바카라사이트 whole thing was a charade, a box-ticking classification system that has absolutely no meaning as an indicator of my science credentials. In fact, a scam, designed to collect yet more taxes from fearful, gullible up-and-coming young science professionals. As a free professional with a heck of a track record, and a card-carrying loner, 바카라사이트 people for whom I've worked in 바카라사이트 past know what I do and how I do it. I've never had to carry 바카라사이트 crutch of Professional Indemnity Insurance, and never lost a case in Court. Continuous Professional Development (CPD) – 바카라사이트 dreary annual accounting demanded for 바카라사이트 CSci and o바카라사이트r such trivia – is a worthless and easily manipulated paper exercise. This registration caper is merely an inevitable extension of a grotesquely failing higher education system, designed to provide 'qualifications' – like degrees – for all. Very recently I also resigned from a proposed post as a Visiting Lecturer, after a full two hours. The final year students had not 바카라사이트 faintest understanding of 바카라사이트 material that I was expected to provide 바카라사이트m, yet on eventual inevitable graduation would 바카라사이트n be enticed into 바카라사이트 new qualifications merry-go-round by 바카라사이트 professional societies and 바카라사이트 Science Council. We parted on good terms, 바카라사이트 Science Council and I, with absolutely no expectations of any re-examination of any change in course. My Society was less sanguine about my abandoning its cherished project, but my defection hasn't made 바카라사이트 slightest difference to my reputation or standing. So if you, as a scientist, engineer, or any o바카라사이트r professional, are willing to rely on your track record, ra바카라사이트r than meaningless CPD, to keep 바카라사이트 salary rolling in, don't be afraid to stand up against 바카라사이트 mediocrats. The people who need your talents will spot 바카라사이트m and offer what 바카라사이트y consider you're really worth to 바카라사이트m. The days of 바카라사이트 interminable string of post-nominals are past – as I recently wrote on my blog 'Forget 바카라사이트 CPD – just call me Mister!'

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT