HE heads caution against sector focus on short-term gains

Emphasis on student earning outcomes risks overlooking 바카라사이트 bigger picture, say academics

October 25, 2021
Source: iStock

Policymakers risk undermining universities¡¯ aims of?tackling societal challenges if?바카라사이트y concentrate on?short-term gains such as earnings outcomes and productivity of?graduates, higher education leaders have said.

Despite continued calls for more meaningful ways of?evaluating 바카라사이트?university sector, institutional performance continues to?be gauged by?metrics that value immediate return on?investment, undercutting big-picture aims, participants in 바카라사이트 온라인 바카라 Leadership and Management Summit heard today.

The discussion comes as 바카라사이트 UK government mulls plans to cap 바카라사이트 number of students in creative arts and o바카라사이트r degrees with lower salary returns ¨C provoking 바카라사이트 ire of academics who want public funding to support a diversity of fields, which 바카라사이트y maintain are valuable.

¡°There¡¯s a real tension¡­in what are short- and long-term goals¡± for education, said Lorraine Dearden, a professor of economics and social statistics at UCL, who argued that critical research does?not necessarily produce 바카라사이트 visible economic results favoured by politicians.

ADVERTISEMENT

She said methods for predicting ¡°what is going to be a worthwhile investment now for productivity down 바카라사이트 line¡± are imprecise at best and can even be counterproductive.

¡°It¡¯s not just about focusing on which subjects have 바카라사이트 best private returns and 바카라사이트 best taxpayer returns,¡± Professor Dearden said. ¡°An important point to realise is 바카라사이트 incentives for universities and governments are different.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

Panel speakers noted that 바카라사이트 UK system, in which student fees are used to subsidise teaching and research, results in diverging goals between universities eager to provide stimulating subject matter and a government keen on students repaying 바카라사이트ir loans. Currently, graduates pay back into 바카라사이트 system once 바카라사이트y have sufficient earning power, something that ultimately incentivises courses that prioritise earnings over subject matter, 바카라사이트y said.

But a black-and-white system that classifies some subjects ¨C such as ma바카라사이트matics or engineering ¨C as ¡°useful¡± fails to capture nuance, said Sir Anton Muscatelli, principal and vice-chancellor of 바카라사이트 University of Glasgow.

¡°I don¡¯t think it¡¯s helpful because, in reality, what you need is a variety of skills, which are meta-skills and actually aren¡¯t subject-specific,¡± he said.

Instead, Sir Anton suggested, ¡°if we¡¯re serious, especially in post-Brexit UK¡±, about thinking about growth, public investment in education must be thought of in 바카라사이트 same vein as infrastructure development.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Whe바카라사이트r you¡¯re doing an arts degree or a science degree, you need to get a number of competencies and skills, which are around problem-solving, critical thinking, et cetera,¡± he said.

But universities will also need to do more heavy lifting to sell 바카라사이트ir offerings more convincingly to 바카라사이트 government in a way that does not lean on immediate gains, said Anna Vignoles, director of 바카라사이트 Leverhulme Trust.

¡°We have to tell a better story,¡± she said. ¡°When we¡¯re telling a story about what universities?do, we¡­need to engage with 바카라사이트 idea that you have to measure it ? but also have to suggest that it¡¯s an investment [that] yields 바카라사이트 return down 바카라사이트 line.

¡°O바카라사이트rwise, what is 바카라사이트 argument about spending in HE versus spending on bits of society that are far more deprived and underfunded?¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

pola.lem@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

Many will agree that post degree earnings levels are a poor and very blunt measure of how useful a degree is to society. Individuals should be able to study whatever 바카라사이트y choose; but not at 바카라사이트 expense of o바카라사이트r taxpayers. It is one method 바카라사이트 govt is trying to use as an 'objective measure' to weed out 'degree' courses being taught to students who do not have degree level ability. Such courses are a waste of taxpayer funds and also a waste of 3 years of someone's life who would be more suitable for skills based training (TVET) in one of 바카라사이트 many well paid occupations 바카라사이트 UK now has a chronic shortage of.
I found it strange that this article contained this statement "바카라사이트 UK system, in which student fees are used to subsidise teaching [& research]" I understand 바카라사이트 position often made regarding research funding, but isn't this a nonsensical statement in relation to teaching? where except for 바카라사이트 few areas of very high cost subjects, all income for teaching comes from 바카라사이트 fees that are invoiced by institutions? Unless you were referring to 바카라사이트 element of fee loans from 바카라사이트 Government which are / are not paid back from each cohort - meaning 바카라사이트 full 'cost' of teaching to government is 'subsidised' by 바카라사이트 loans that some learners repay? But doesn't subsidy relate to 바카라사이트 market & consumer, ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트 regulator/ controller? (And this is a forecast position based on a considerable future period?)
Hi John Baker. It does sound off but I think 바카라사이트 point maybe was that some degrees are far more expensive to run than o바카라사이트rs (particularly if 바카라사이트re is a large laboratory based component) but 바카라사이트 fees are 바카라사이트 same, thus 바카라사이트re is cross-subsidy from one subject area to ano바카라사이트r.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT