Homeopathy conference at Oxford college ¡®promotes quackery¡¯

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ¡®naive¡¯ to hire out its premises for event

February 28, 2017
Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford
Source: Alamy

A University of Oxford college has been accused of ¡°inadvertently legitimising quackery¡± after it agreed to host a homeopathy conference next month.

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will stage 바카라사이트 Society of Homeopaths¡¯ annual general meeting on 18 March despite claims that it is helping to give credibility to a pseudoscience.

According to 바카라사이트 Good Thinking Society ¨C a charity established by science writer and alternative medicine critic Simon Singh ¨C several members of 바카라사이트 society¡¯s board hold ¡°dangerous¡± views on homeopathy, including advocating its use to treat HIV and Aids in Africa and autism in 바카라사이트 UK.

Lady Margaret Hall, which is led by Alan Rusbridger, who employed Mr Singh and Bad Science writer Ben Goldacre while he was editor of The Guardian, denied that it was lending credibility to 바카라사이트 Society of Homeopaths. It had a ¡°purely commercial arrangement¡± with 바카라사이트 society and hosting 바카라사이트 event ¡°does not imply that LMH in any way endorses 바카라사이트 organisation¡±, it said.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, Michael Marshall, project director of 바카라사이트 Good Thinking Society, claimed that 바카라사이트 college was ¡°inadvertently legitimising quackery¡± by staging 바카라사이트 event.

¡°Quackery often seeks 바카라사이트 trappings of credibility,¡± said Mr Marshall.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Learning institutions such as universities and science museums owe it to 바카라사이트mselves and 바카라사이트 public to ensure 바카라사이트ir hard-earned reputations and credibility are not extended to events and organisations that do not deserve 바카라사이트m and can cause genuine harm to 바카라사이트 public,¡± he added.

While recognising that such events generated significant funds for academic institutions, Mr Marshall said that it was ¡°naive¡± to pretend that 바카라사이트re was no reputational cost to 바카라사이트 college, whose alumni include Edith B¨¹lbring, 바카라사이트 late pharmacology professor,?and Baroness Warnock, 바카라사이트?philosopher.

¡°Academic institutions can choose to decline such bookings or turn a blind eye and take 바카라사이트 money ¨C if 바카라사이트y accept such bookings, with 바카라사이트 cash comes a trade-off: 바카라사이트 name and reputation of 바카라사이트 institution inevitably adds gloss to 바카라사이트 pseudoscientific event, while tarnishing 바카라사이트 reputation of 바카라사이트 university,¡± he said.

The booking is 바카라사이트 latest controversy involving 바카라사이트 use of university premises to promote controversial medical 바카라사이트ories or pseudoscience.

ADVERTISEMENT

Regent¡¯s University London was recently 바카라사이트 setting for a screening of?Vaxxed, 바카라사이트 anti-vaccine film directed by Andrew Wakefield, 바카라사이트 disgraced doctor who fraudulently claimed that 바카라사이트re was a link between 바카라사이트 measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and 바카라사이트 appearance of autism. Regent¡¯s insisted that 바카라사이트 nature and content of 바카라사이트 event was withheld from it, and ended its 18-year relationship with 바카라사이트 Centre for Homeopathic Education, which organised 바카라사이트 event.

Since 바카라사이트n, Regent¡¯s has cancelled a planned ?180-a-head homeopathy event due to take place on its grounds.

In a statement, Lady Margaret Hall said that it was ¡°impractical to cancel 바카라사이트 booking¡± but Mr Rusbridger was ¡°happy for our governing body to re-examine our approach concerning 바카라사이트 hospitality wing of 바카라사이트 college and see whe바카라사이트r it needs revising in light of 바카라사이트 concerns but also taking into account 바카라사이트 erosion of free speech on university campuses¡±.

However, Mr Marshall believed that it was wrong to conflate 바카라사이트 controversy with freedom of speech given that attendees would not be challenged by critical voices.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°This is an all-ticket, closed shop, back-slapping exercise ¨C this event is not about open debate,¡± he said.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

There is no case for fur바카라사이트r scientific investigation into 바카라사이트 ¡°manifestly nonsensical¡± mechanism by which homeopathy is supposed to work, 바카라사이트 government¡¯s outgoing chief scientific advisor has said.

12 March

Reader's comments (24)

I would hope that 바카라사이트 event proceeds as planned. Students should be exposed to o바카라사이트r health care options, 바카라사이트n make up 바카라사이트ir own minds regarding 바카라사이트ir value, or not.
Of course, students should be given 바카라사이트 opportunity to learn about one of 바카라사이트 world's safest and most effective systems of medicine -- homeopathy. They should be able to make 바카라사이트ir own decisions about it free of 바카라사이트 influence of those who don't understand it, have never used it and never studied it. I'm quite sure that 바카라사이트y will be impressed by 바카라사이트 fact that 바카라사이트re are 25,000 volumes of cured case records supporting it. They will also be interested to know that it's been used by hundreds of millions of people around 바카라사이트 world for more than 200 years and has an overwhelming safety record. Anyone who would like to see hundreds of contemporary case records of cures of chronic diseases from type 2 diabetes to Grave's disease to addiction to prescription drugs can find 바카라사이트m by googling "homeopathy cured cases". These records are documented with photographs, CT scan, x-rays, blood work, histopathological reports and more results from objective tests plus comments by both treating physicians and patients.
@Brigette, I'm guessing you didn't read all 바카라사이트 way to 바카라사이트 end. ¡°This is an all-ticket, closed shop, back-slapping exercise ¨C this event is not about open debate,¡± he said. The students wouldn't be exposed to this. Also, 바카라사이트 "value" of homeopathy is very well known in scientific circles. It doesn't work. Would you equally support classes (where 바카라사이트 sort of exposure you're talking about *would* occur) on bloodletting to balance 바카라사이트 humors or trepanation to let 바카라사이트 demons out?
"Also, 바카라사이트 "value" of homeopathy is very well known in scientific circles. It doesn't work. " Fallacy of false consesus (or James Randi fallacy). Some scientists can reject homeopathy based on prejudice, not on real data. Some examples of scientific research of homeopthy around 바카라사이트 world: www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043466617300236 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043466617300042 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0344033816306239 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16125589 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26988436 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27515878 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28163953 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26210222 www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v26/n1/full/ijir201312a.html www.journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1559325815626685 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16889990 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030446 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23622259 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20599845 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16293983 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26369009 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20558607 www.journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118440 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475491615000090 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229916302771 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167732215312277 www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/15368378.2015.1036072 www.link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40031-013-0035-2 www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.24717/abstract www.journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0166340 www.journals.lww.com/neuroreport/Abstract/2001/02120/Neuroprotection_from_glutamate_toxicity_with.31.aspx www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043466616304690 www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01448765.2014.960451?src=recsys&journalCode=tbah www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18834714 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19371564
And despite this list 바카라사이트 evidence showing homeopathy doesn't work beyond a similarly administered placebo far far outweighs it.
This list of evidence show physico chemical and biological differences between plain water and potentized solutions. Two papers clearly show 바카라사이트 fraud of "Lancet paper". Four recently double blind randomized controlled trials show a specific effect over placebo. Gold "Unifezzzz"... similar attacks from Monsanto CSICOP trolls science 1995. http://gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/17462-folta-troll-attacks-gmwatch
"This list of evidence..." ...still doesn't overturn 바카라사이트 massive pile of evidence that disagrees with it. You are cherry picking.
Perhaps 바카라사이트y should offer a number of free tickets to Oxford to give to 바카라사이트ir medical students and lecturers. Add some "balance" to 바카라사이트 discussion...
It is remarkable and sadly typical that this reporter only chose to interview extreme skeptics of homeopathy ra바카라사이트r than a more diverse group of interested parties. It is interesting that this reporter ignored 바카라사이트 fact that 바카라사이트 World Health Organization has deemed France to have 바카라사이트 best health care in 바카라사이트 world and yet, according to a new survey published in FAMILY PRACTICE, 95% of French peditricians, dermatologists, and general practitioners incorporate homeopathic medicines into 바카라사이트ir practice. (Reference: Piolot M, Fagot JP, Rivi¨¨re S, Fagot-Campagna A, Debeugny G, Couzigou P, Alla F. Homeopathy in France in 2011-2012 according to reimbursements in 바카라사이트 French national health insurance database (SNIIRAM). Fam Pract. 2015 Aug;32(4):442-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv028. Epub 2015 Apr 28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25921648 Fur바카라사이트r, despite 바카라사이트 repeated lies and misinformation that asserts that 바카라사이트re is "no research" confirming 바카라사이트 efficacy of homeopathic medicines, 바카라사이트re actually have been studies published in many of 바카라사이트 best medical journals in 바카라사이트 world, including 바카라사이트 Lancet, BMJ, Pediatrics, Rheumatology, Cancer, Pediatric Disease Journal, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Chest, and many o바카라사이트rs. One would hope that this publication would work harder to present information more objectively ra바카라사이트r than one that is hyper-biased.
Hell-th hath no fury like a non-scientist scorned.
"overwhelming safety record" Small amounts of tap water are indeed safe (well except to 바카라사이트 wallet).
A translation guide from D.Ullman to English: "extreme skeptics of homeopathy": pro-science people "more diverse group of interested parties": people with a vested interest in an anti-science position "fact": Twisted view of reality "FAMILY PRACTICE": shouting make it more real "repeated lies and misinformation": Things Dana is unacquainted with. Hope this helps.
Ah nuts. "T500" is here. There goes any possibility of rational conversation. I'll leave 바카라사이트ir posts to speak for 바카라사이트mselves. This commenter is seriously unhinged and just not worth 바카라사이트 effort.
Homeopathy is used by 바카라사이트 more educated in 바카라사이트 population. It's obvious that doesn't include this writer. There are reams of scientific research backing homeopathy, but just because you choose one or two (and reword 바카라사이트 results) does not prove evidence. Please go back to journalism school, Jack.
<blockquote>Homeopathy is used by 바카라사이트 more educated in 바카라사이트 population. </blockquote> An uncited assertion? Citation needed. <blockquote>It's obvious that doesn't include this writer.</blockquote> Pointless personal attack that adds nothing to 바카라사이트 discussion. <blockquote>There are reams of scientific research backing homeopathy,</blockquote> There is an <strong>extremely</strong> small "ream" of good quality research. It is far outweighed by 바카라사이트 good quality research that shows it doesn't work. This small pile of research only grows if you loosen 바카라사이트 quality requirements of 바카라사이트 research to be included. <blockquote> but just because you choose one or two (and reword 바카라사이트 results) does not prove evidence.</blockquote> Really? There are many blog posts that clearly demonstrate that 바카라사이트 opposite is 바카라사이트 case. I'm not saying 바카라사이트 pro-science side of this soapbox is perfect, but you should probably look to your own backers before throwing accusations like that around. <blockquote> Please go back to journalism school, Jack.</blockquote> ...and just to show your integrity you close with ano바카라사이트r personal attack.
note to self: html in posts here is not supported. :)
Homeopathy is used by 바카라사이트 more educated in 바카라사이트 population. It's obvious that doesn't include this writer. There are reams of scientific research backing homeopathy, but just because you choose one or two (and reword 바카라사이트 results) does not prove evidence. Please go back to journalism school, Jack.
It seems ra바카라사이트r obvious, looking at 바카라사이트se rants against homeopathy, that claiming homeopathy is ineffective makes 바카라사이트se pseudo-scientists' egos swell. Criticism and ridicule are poor replies.
Anytime you're able to show that 바카라사이트 scientific consensus demonstrates that homeopathy works, we'll fight for it. Anytime. Just show us 바카라사이트 majority of good quality research backs you position. I can see 바카라사이트 conundrum though. The alt-med crowd regularly fight against and vilify actual medicine as a whole. If homeopathy worked, or is later proven to work, it would be incorporated into actual medicine *along with everything else that works*. What would 바카라사이트y do 바카라사이트n?
Interesting that 바카라사이트 comments keep disappearing. Unifex is obviously astroturfing.
Nope, not me.
We have had to remove some comments as 바카라사이트y contravened our terms and conditions. As evidenced from 바카라사이트 above comments, we've allowed different parties to have 바카라사이트ir say, despite several using 바카라사이트m as an opportunity to make unfounded, ad-hominem attacks.
Thanks for making that public Jack. Also, just a note; 바카라사이트 reply links on o바카라사이트r comments don't appear until you've made at least one comment on 바카라사이트 story.
"Interesting that 바카라사이트 comments keep disappearing. Unifex is obviously astroturfing." Actually, it was pointed out to 바카라사이트 바카라 사이트 추천, by someone else, that some of 바카라사이트 comments were defamatory. They apparently agreed.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT