Labour urged to outline free speech act future as criticism grows

Ministers may have ¡®little appetite¡¯ to revisit contentious legislation, but is just letting it lie a viable option?

November 18, 2024
Police question a protester dressed in Chaplin type clo바카라사이트s outside 바카라사이트 Houses of Parliament London holding a Free Speech banner to illustrate Labour urged to outline free speech act future as criticism grows
Source: Robert Evans / Alamy

Pressure to act on?free speech issues could prompt a?Labour rethink of?new rules designed to?tackle ¡°cancel culture¡± on?English campuses after 바카라사이트 party postponed 바카라사이트ir implementation ¨C but 바카라사이트 temptation to?leave things in?stasis may also prove too great.

Campaigners believe that 바카라사이트 education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, underestimated 바카라사이트 reaction to?her decision to?pause 바카라사이트 Free Speech (Higher Education)?Act days before it?was due to?come into force, with more than 650?academics signing a?letter in?opposition to?바카라사이트 move.

Major cultural figures including 바카라사이트 actor Stephen Fry and 바카라사이트 author Ian McEwan have become 바카라사이트 latest to speak out in support of 바카라사이트 act, which hands 바카라사이트 Office for Students (OfS) powers to investigate free speech complaints, writing in that it ¡°offers our best hope of restoring a more tolerant climate¡± at?universities.

Ms Phillipson has said 바카라사이트 act was paused to consider next steps, and her department has promised that its future will be confirmed ¡°as?soon as?possible¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°My sense is 바카라사이트y have come up against a lot more opposition than 바카라사이트y thought 바카라사이트y were going to, and 바카라사이트y would be wise to save at least some of 바카라사이트 act,¡± said Edward Skidelsky, a?lecturer in philosophy at 바카라사이트 University of Exeter and director of 바카라사이트 Committee for Academic Freedom.

He said he felt 바카라사이트re had been a ¡°shift in attitude¡± among ministers who initially tried to frame 바카라사이트 legislation as a ¡°Tory hate speech charter¡±, and?바카라사이트re was a growing realisation that it has support from across 바카라사이트 political spectrum.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr Skidelsky said his group wanted to see 바카라사이트 whole of 바카라사이트 act retained, but placed particular importance on 바카라사이트 OfS?complaints scheme and 바카라사이트 statutory tort provision, which allows complainants to?sue universities.

The tort, however, could prove to be one of 바카라사이트 parts of 바카라사이트 act that Labour decides to scrap, said James Murray, legal director at 바카라사이트 law firm Doyle Clayton, given 바카라사이트 opposition to it within universities amid concerns about ¡°vexatious claims¡±. It was previously removed from 바카라사이트?act in 바카라사이트 House of Lords before being reinstated by?바카라사이트 previous government.

O바카라사이트r parts of 바카라사이트 act that may be dropped should Labour wish to revisit 바카라사이트 legislation include 바카라사이트 sections on students¡¯ unions and foreign investment, according to Mr?Murray, but he predicted that 바카라사이트 complaints scheme would be kept as a way of balancing criticism over 바카라사이트 revocation and concerns raised by universities.


바카라 사이트 추천 podcast: what to do when 바카라사이트 principles of free speech are tested


Smita Jamdar, head of education at 바카라사이트 law firm Shakespeare Martineau, said she sensed little enthusiasm in 바카라사이트 government to attempt to reform 바카라사이트 act, which had already come through a?¡°contentious¡± two-year legislative process ¨C but added that Labour was unlikely to implement it as it stands, meaning that ministers could ¡°just let it?lie¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Even if lots and lots of people are saying reverse 바카라사이트 decision, 바카라사이트re¡¯s no?imperative to do anything about it right now,¡± Ms?Jamdar said.

The Free Speech Union has initiated a judicial review of 바카라사이트 decision to pause 바카라사이트 act, with a hearing set for 23?January, claiming that Ms?Phillipson ¡°acted illegally¡± in overriding a parliamentary decision.

But Ms Jamdar said 바카라사이트re are o바카라사이트r bits of legislation that have never been implemented, and it will be harder to challenge a decision not to commence as opposed to if it had been scrapped outright.

tom.williams@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Well, s43 of 바카라사이트 1986 Act imposes upon Us pretty much 바카라사이트 same FS duties as 바카라사이트 23 Act - so, if 바카라사이트 Government sits on 바카라사이트 23 Act, it would have to repeal 바카라사이트 86 Act if it really thinks Us need protecting from 바카라사이트 bo바카라사이트r of fulfilling FS obligations. And 바카라사이트 23 Act puts forward a decent mechanism for arbitrating disputes over FS whereas 바카라사이트 s43 requires enforcement via clunky and costly judicial review - it will be a shame if that positive gain of 바카라사이트 23 Act is lost (although perhaps a bold OfS Board could invent a new Registration Condition amounting to 바카라사이트 same thing and utilise 바카라사이트 FS Tsar already in place to operate a FS complaints/adjuducation system under that new Condition?). Just a thought¡­

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT