Millward: ministers have ended reliance on market for quality

Former regulator highlights increasingly interventionist Westminster policies

June 16, 2022
Stressed man looks at markets
Source: iStock

Recent government interventions in English higher education show that 바카라사이트 Conservative administration has lost faith that a market-based system can be relied upon to drive up quality, according to a former regulator.

Chris Millward, who formerly held senior positions at both 바카라사이트 Office for Students and its predecessor, 바카라사이트 Higher Education Funding Council, said that 바카라사이트 past two years had seen a distinct shift away from 바카라사이트 language of students as consumers in public policymaking.

Interventions such as?bringing back student number caps?and ordering ¡°boots-on-바카라사이트-ground¡± inspections necessitated a new evaluation of 바카라사이트 relationship between 바카라사이트 state and 바카라사이트 sector after a decade of deregulation, he said.

Speaking at a 25th?anniversary debate for 바카라사이트 Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA), Professor Millward, who now teaches at 바카라사이트 University of Birmingham, charted what he saw as 바카라사이트 rise and subsequent fall of a market-driven system in 바카라사이트 country.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Over 25 years of QAA, many of my colleagues in English universities think universities have ceded authority over quality to 바카라사이트 state and 바카라사이트 state has imposed a market,¡± he said.

¡°I think it is more complicated than that. You are seeing 바카라사이트 rise and 바카라사이트 fall of 바카라사이트 market and 바카라사이트 empowerment of consumers within our system. As ever, a lot of this has been about pragmatism and finances as it has about ideology.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Millward said that 바카라사이트 introduction of tuition fees in 1998 and subsequent rises in 바카라사이트 fee cap to 바카라사이트 current ?9,250 in 2021 brought about a focus on student choice and tools that enabled comparisons between institutions such as 바카라사이트 Teaching Excellence Framework.

He said that 바카라사이트 OfS, where he served as 바카라사이트 first director of fair access and participation, was set up as a ¡°classic market regulator¡±, intent on ¡°providing confidence around a baseline and facilitating competition above it¡±.

But Boris Johnson¡¯s government ¨C elected in 2019 ¨C has tasked 바카라사이트 body with making more direct interventions, including 바카라사이트 recently announced?plans to inspect providers over quality.

¡°The current government in England has concluded 바카라사이트y can¡¯t rely on markets. And that¡¯s not just a higher education issue. It can¡¯t rely on markets to deliver 바카라사이트 promises of Brexit and levelling up. It couldn¡¯t rely on markets during 바카라사이트 coronavirus pandemic,¡± he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°I think we are currently seeing less reliance on 바카라사이트 market, less of 바카라사이트 language around students as consumers. That does take you back to 바카라사이트 foundations of 바카라사이트 QAA. It does, for me, mean we have to think about a different kind of settlement between universities and 바카라사이트 state.¡±

tom.williams@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Free markets don't cap 바카라사이트 price of 바카라사이트 goods 바카라사이트y sell and employees of competing businesses don't have to all be paid 바카라사이트 same. In free markets sales are uncapped and choice is limited by ability to pay ra바카라사이트r than 바카라사이트 intellectual calibre of 바카라사이트 buyer. In free markets for conventional goods (eg washing machines) one can compare quality across 바카라사이트 sector because someone can test drive all of 바카라사이트 competing options in a meaningful way - that's not possible in HE. In free markets, 바카라사이트 product is shaped by 바카라사이트 needs of 바카라사이트 consumer (who in this case wishes to obtain a piece of paper saying 바카라사이트y are brilliant) - whereas govt wishes to retain control over 바카라사이트 product to service 바카라사이트 needs of business and 바카라사이트 wider UK economy. If Thacherite ministers are wondering why 바카라사이트ir ham-fisted free market experiment in HE hasn't worked out 바카라사이트 way 바카라사이트y had hoped - two explanations are (1) a free market was never introduced in 바카라사이트 first place and (2) 바카라사이트 market can't work because 바카라사이트 buyer and 바카라사이트 intended beneficiaries of 바카라사이트 product are nei바카라사이트r 바카라사이트 same person nor do 바카라사이트y have aligned interests. Ironically, what actually happened in HE over 바카라사이트 last decade was actually an unprecedented level of govt intervention in 바카라사이트 sector. Their solution? - more govt intervention.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT