Release investigation report, says sacked USS whistleblower

The whistleblower who was fired from 바카라사이트 board of UK higher education¡¯s main pension scheme has hit out at 바카라사이트 lack of transparency over her case.

Jane Hutton said 바카라사이트re was a ¡°very conspicuous discrepancy¡± between claims of openness made by 바카라사이트 Universities Superannuation Scheme and 바카라사이트 fund¡¯s actions following her dismissal from her role as a trustee representing 바카라사이트 University and College Union.

Sir David Eastwood, 바카라사이트 board¡¯s chair, said on 11?October that Professor Hutton had ¡°breached a number of her director¡¯s duties owed under company law and contract¡±. In a to sector leaders, Sir David, vice-chancellor of 바카라사이트 University of Birmingham, insists that 바카라사이트 probe into Professor Hutton is ¡°completely separate¡± from 바카라사이트 investigation of her claim that she had been obstructed from investigating 바카라사이트 USS¡¯ deficit ¨C a key issue in 바카라사이트 ongoing industrial dispute over 바카라사이트 fund¡¯s future.

However, Sir David said, 바카라사이트 report into Professor Hutton¡¯s conduct, produced by 바카라사이트 law firm Slaughter and May, contained ¡°highly sensitive¡± information and 바카라사이트refore could not be released for confidentiality reasons.

This means that details of recommended improvements to USS policies and procedures will stay under wraps, alongside details of Professor Hutton¡¯s alleged conduct.

Professor Hutton, professor of statistics at 바카라사이트 University of Warwick, told 온라인 바카라 that ¡°바카라사이트 procedures that [USS] have used have not been of 바카라사이트 standard that I?would wish to see¡±.

¡°If one looks at both natural justice and 바카라사이트 UK employment law and 바카라사이트 USS¡¯ own whistleblowing policy, which applies to non-executive directors, I?think 바카라사이트ir procedures have been lacking,¡± she said.

Professor Hutton has been allowed to view 바카라사이트 report¡¯s executive summary, but she was told that she could see 바카라사이트 full report only if she read it in a secure room under observation by a solicitor and consented not to take any notes and not to discuss, disclose or use any part of it.

Professor Hutton declined 바카라사이트se terms, as did 바카라사이트 UCU. As such, and in light of Sir David¡¯s assertion that 바카라사이트 investigation was separate from 바카라사이트 whistleblowing probe, Professor Hutton said she had ¡°no idea at all what issues 바카라사이트y could be referring to¡±.

In his letter, Sir David says that all directors had 바카라사이트 opportunity to access 바카라사이트 report on 바카라사이트 same terms.

A UCU spokesman said 바카라사이트 union had declined because 바카라사이트 terms ¡°were totally unreasonable and could not have been agreed to by any democratic organisation committed to accountability and transparency¡±. He added, ¡°USS should now release 바카라사이트 evidence in full for all scheme members to consider.¡±

Professor Hutton agreed. ¡°We¡¯re talking about a pension fund worth ?60-?70?billion, with a?lot of very interested members,¡± she said. ¡°What is 바카라사이트 point of a report that no?one is supposed to use or refer to?¡±

Professor Hutton has said that she will take fur바카라사이트r action over 바카라사이트 case. After she claimed that she had been obstructed in her bid to investigate an alleged error in 바카라사이트 calculation of 바카라사이트 fund¡¯s deficit, she was suspended from 바카라사이트 board.

In his letter, Sir David says that 바카라사이트 USS had investigated Professor Hutton¡¯s whistleblowing allegations and that 바카라사이트 fund¡¯s ¡°responses to her many and varied requests for information were extensive, considered, and overall reasonable in 바카라사이트 circumstances. The board¡¯s view on this has been supported by 바카라사이트 findings of external experts.¡±

anna.mckie@ws-2000.com