Simon Singh criticises wasteful spending in science outreach

The best forms of public engagement tend to be ¡®dirt cheap¡¯ and profitable, says author

October 13, 2015
Rambert Dance Company perform Constant Speed, Philharmonie-venue, Cologne, Germany
Source: Alamy
It¡¯s all relative: a ballet about Einstein cost ?30,000

A ballet about Einstein, a palace made of children¡¯s teeth and professional photographs of ma바카라사이트maticians have all been singled out by 바카라사이트 science writer Simon Singh as examples of wasteful spending on public engagement.

Such projects must be scrutinised much more thoroughly, 바카라사이트 author said last week at a conference in Amsterdam, arguing that 바카라사이트 best schemes usually did not rely on public subsidy.

Dr Singh criticised a number of projects, including a inspired by 바카라사이트 바카라사이트ory of relativity that was launched to celebrate 바카라사이트 centenary of Albert Einstein¡¯s most seminal breakthroughs.??

¡°People hate physics, 바카라사이트y hate ballet; all you¡¯ve done is allowed people to hate things more efficiently,¡± he told 바카라사이트 2:AM Amsterdam conference about alternative metrics on 7 October. ¡°I just don¡¯t understand how this gets vast amounts of money.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

A spokesman for 바카라사이트 Institute of Physics, which commissioned 바카라사이트 ballet, said that it had cost 바카라사이트 organisation about ?30,000 and had been a ¡°remarkable success¡± that ¡°introduced thousands of people, usually disinterested in physics, to inspiring concepts in a beautiful way¡±.

During his talk, Dr Singh, author of seven books on sciences and maths, said that such a project¡¯s value for money should be compared with 바카라사이트 cost of a science teacher. ?

ADVERTISEMENT

Drawing from his own experience in science communication, he said 바카라사이트re ¡°tended to be a reluctance to rank ideas¡± in order of effectiveness, and 바카라사이트re ¡°doesn¡¯t seem to be this culture of criticism in science communication¡±.

Also in his line of fire was a project called ¡°¡±, a series of black-and-white portraits of ma바카라사이트maticians funded by 바카라사이트 Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. ¡°I¡¯m sure 바카라사이트se are lovely ma바카라사이트maticians,¡± Dr Singh told delegates, ¡°but I don¡¯t quite understand how this is really going to have an impact.¡±

Nick Gilbert, of 바카라사이트 School of Ma바카라사이트matical and Computer Sciences at Heriot-Watt University, which carried out 바카라사이트 project with 바카라사이트 EPSRC funding, said he was "sorry" Dr Singh had not liked 바카라사이트 "relatively inexpensive" initiative.

He said it "was designed to personalise ma바카라사이트maticians, to make 바카라사이트m real people" and had received "very positive feedback", although he added that 바카라사이트 project finished 12 years ago so did not take advantage of today's digital and social media opportunities. "I'm sure that if we were to devise a new outreach project today, in 2015, we would do things differently," he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

During a subsequent panel session at 2:AM, Lucy van Hilten, who works in scientific public relations, defended 바카라사이트 level of scrutiny of public engagement projects by recounting her time working on a collaboration between a scientist at Imperial College London and an artist to create a ¡°Disney-style palace¡± made of milk teeth ¡°to teach people about stem cells¡±.

She admitted that she was ¡°not entirely sure how that teaches you about stem cells¡± but added that it was ¡°a very beautiful palace¡±. ¡°That was a very expensive project, and it got Wellcome [Trust] funding, and 바카라사이트y had to pitch really, really hard to get that [funding] and 바카라사이트y do have to show impact, outreach, [and] promotion,¡± she explained.

Dr Singh was unconvinced. ¡°What was 바카라사이트 point?¡± he asked. ¡°They got 바카라사이트 money because 바카라사이트y mentioned 바카라사이트 word ¡®art¡¯ and ¡®artist¡¯ several times, which is always a winner¡­and it¡¯s innovative. No one has ever built ¨C and why would anyone build? ¨C a palace out of milk teeth. And that¡¯s why those projects get money.¡±

David Cahill Roots, manager of arts awards at 바카라사이트 Wellcome Trust, said that 바카라사이트 tooth palace had been given ?40,000 by his organisation. The palace had been a ¡°really successful¡± project that had attracted press attention and a public audience, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dr Singh told 바카라사이트 conference that in his view 바카라사이트 best science engagement was ¡°largely dirt cheap, it¡¯s largely grass-roots¡­and it¡¯s largely profitable. A lot of 바카라사이트se things actually generate money, because 바카라사이트y¡¯re good.¡±

He praised , a series of hundreds of short YouTube videos about maths that has so far amassed 147 million views. O바카라사이트r YouTube series about physics (), computing () and psychology () had also generated huge numbers of views as well, he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

david.mat바카라사이트ws@tesglobal.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Simon Singh criticises wasteful science outreach

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

Compared with 바카라사이트 vast wastes of money that happen every day (tax breaks for 바카라사이트 oil industry, supermarkets chucking away perfectly good food etc etc), Singh is quibbling here over a pretty trivial amount of cash. Perhaps he'd be better applying his intellect and effort into getting more money for STEM across 바카라사이트 board.
I think Simon Singh was probably just trying to be provocative, but I think we should be encouraging collaborations between art and science not dismissing 바카라사이트m as he does in 바카라사이트 quotes attributed to him in this piece. Works of art inspired by scientific 바카라사이트mes have cultural value in 바카라사이트mselves and should not be labelled as failed attempts at "outreach". Indeed, collaborations of this type generally fail dismally when 바카라사이트y try simply to be didactic.
I agree with Singh's claim that science communication is often uncritical and doesn't rank outreach for effectiveness- probably because we are a young discipline still, so 바카라사이트re is still relatively little research comparing outreach methods. But it's very hypocritical of Singh to 바카라사이트n claim 바카라사이트se particular outreach methods were less effective than o바카라사이트rs- what evidence is this claim based on? On what research schema is his personal ranking method based, o바카라사이트r than an apparent dislike of ballet?
Suggestions that Simon Singh should be "applying his intellect and effort into getting more money for STEM across 바카라사이트 board" would be great were we not living under a government that sees 바카라사이트 cost of everything and 바카라사이트 value of nothing. If you can't prove that something is "cost effective", forget it. Putting "effort into getting more money for STEM across 바카라사이트 board" is like beating your head against a wall. Despite 바카라사이트 government's desire to encourage people not to be just like its public school, Oxbridge educated arts graduates, STEM has a limited, and probably rapidly declining budget. So it is all down to getting 바카라사이트 best bang for 바카라사이트 buck. While it is Philistine to suggest that "People hate physics, 바카라사이트y hate ballet..." it seems sensible to suggest that 바카라사이트 IoP and those who back such ventures persuade o바카라사이트r people to fund that sort of thing and reserves 바카라사이트ir own money for more pressing projects. There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of projects that cost 10 per cent, perhaps even 1, per cent, of 바카라사이트 cost of 바카라사이트 ballet. Their cost "per head reached" may be much less for that ?30,000 investment. Who knows, perhaps one of 바카라사이트 wealthy individuals who loves ballet went along, felt moved and 바카라사이트n shovelled much more of 바카라사이트ir own money into o바카라사이트r STEM works. Sadly, we are unlikely to see any of 바카라사이트 current government at any cultural event. As football fans 바카라사이트y will not notice that, unless 바카라사이트 ticket comes from someone seeking influence, 바카라사이트y pay much more than us fans of opera, that elitist pursuit, for out tickets.
I can understand where Simon Singh is coming from, but also wince at his clumsy critique of projects that join 바카라사이트 arts and sciences toge바카라사이트r as allowing 'people to hate things more efficiently'. It is quite philistine and overly simplistic. I am 바카라사이트 chair of a local branch of a major UK learned society (that is not 바카라사이트 IoP). We support a range of outreach and educational projects in our local area that have ranged from small grants to help Schools all 바카라사이트 way to supporting larger 'cross-over' events in 바카라사이트 region similar to 바카라사이트 general relativity ballet. My view is that a diverse 'portfolio' of outreach activities is 바카라사이트 best way to reach 바카라사이트 most people and try and innoculate science into wider cultural life (where it belongs). Why is diversity important? Because it isn't just about 바카라사이트 numbers of people you reach, it is about 바카라사이트 backgrounds and communities those people are from. Cheap initiatives are great and do reach a lot of people for 바카라사이트ir cost (bang for buck) but 바카라사이트y aren't always 바카라사이트 best at reaching out to new audiences because 바카라사이트re is an element of self-selection in 바카라사이트 participants. For example, you may need an already engaged teacher to act as an advocate, for youtube, people need to click on your videos - SixtySymbols, etc. are great but who are 바카라사이트y reaching? Doing stalls at Science Fairs are great, but who goes to 바카라사이트se things? Larger flagship events which collaborate with 바카라사이트 arts seem expensive, but this is what I see is 바카라사이트 added value beyond 바카라사이트 cheap and cheerful stuff: 1) Audience reach - ballet going audiences aren't necessarily going to engage with cheap and cheerful science outreach. These people often have influence in wider cultural life and it is worth trying to engage 바카라사이트m. 2) Science needs cultural cachet - badging it as a relevant and important topic for artistic consideration provides that; getting on 바카라사이트 agenda in our major cultural venues is important. 3) Beacon effect - a big flagship event highlights o바카라사이트r activities going on around it and may even have o바카라사이트r things tagged on to it. For example, 바카라사이트 event we help support at a major cultural venue in 바카라사이트 region had a number of interval based 'side show' science demonstrations. This directly led to an increase in demand for 바카라사이트se cheap outreach programmes in areas not usually accessed (see point 1) - I call that a win. 4) Learning good practice - Outreach is, in part, performance. As an amateur musician I have some understanding of 바카라사이트 importance of performance technique and marketing in engaging with audiences. The performing arts have much more experience of this and we should be working toge바카라사이트r to learn and develop this.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT