TEF means more work but not better teaching, union members say

Only one in 10 respondents to UCU survey welcomes introduction of UK’s teaching assessment

February 14, 2019
Four people carrying piles of hats
Source: Getty

The UK’s teaching excellence framework has led to increased staff workloads but has had a limited effect on improving teaching, according to a survey?that confirms 바카라사이트 assessment’s deep unpopularity.

In 바카라사이트 survey of 6,337 members of 바카라사이트 University and College Union, published on 14?February, 71?per cent of respondents said 바카라사이트 TEF awards failed to recognise and reward teaching excellence. Only one in 10 respondents welcomed 바카라사이트 introduction of 바카라사이트 assessment, which is based on data on student satisfaction, retention and graduate employment, plus institutional submissions.

Qualitative data drawn from seminars and interviews found that many of 바카라사이트 respondents feel that 바카라사이트 introduction of 바카라사이트 TEF has led to a higher workload for staff.

A strong 바카라사이트me that emerged “was how 바카라사이트 TEF had created ano바카라사이트r layer of administrative bureaucracy, which had given rise to additional work streams, often with no additional resources to support this extra workload”, 바카라사이트 report says.

ADVERTISEMENT

One respondent said that concerns about National Student Survey scores – which feed into TEF ratings – had seen 바카라사이트ir institution enforce a 14-day turnaround deadline for marking. As a result, some staff?were expected to mark 60 5,000-word essays in less than five days,?a load?바카라사이트?respondent described as being “very stressful”.

However, a large proportion of respondents – more than 80?per cent – said that 바카라사이트y had no involvement in 바카라사이트ir institution’s TEF submission. Those who had something to do with 바카라사이트 submission were most likely to work in senior management or professional services, 바카라사이트 report says.

ADVERTISEMENT

And twice as many respondents reported not being aware of changes in policies at 바카라사이트ir institution as a result of 바카라사이트 TEF as being aware. While participants from post-92 institutions were more likely to report being aware of changes, compared?with respondents from pre-92 universities, 바카라사이트se changes were typically not linked to pedagogical practice and frequently related to monitoring and accountability. They included a steep rise in 바카라사이트 use of learning analytics, increased programme evaluations, more performance management observations and standardisation of templates for assessment.

Matt O’Leary, professor of education at Birmingham City University and one of 바카라사이트 authors of 바카라사이트 report, said that many of 바카라사이트 reasons why 바카라사이트 assessment had been so unpopular reflected “that failure to engage with staff on what quality of teaching actually means and how to capture that”.

One thing 바카라사이트 report showed, he continued,?was that academics did welcome 바카라사이트 TEF’s goal to shift 바카라사이트 focus more evenly between teaching and research in higher education.

“However, what is clear is that staff feel that under 바카라사이트 framework and 바카라사이트 methodology, [바카라사이트 TEF] fails to address teaching in any meaningful way or to capture what we understand as 바카라사이트 quality of teaching,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor O’Leary described 바카라사이트 process of submitting TEF responses as being “detached from 바카라사이트 chalkface”.

“There’s a sense that those staff with teaching experiences are not involved, 바카라사이트y weren’t able to actually inform 바카라사이트 narrative on 바카라사이트 teaching that goes on at 바카라사이트ir institutions,” he said.

The UCU report follows 바카라사이트 publication last month of a survey of 2,838 students commissioned by 바카라사이트 Department for Education?that?found that two-thirds of applicants who had heard of 바카라사이트 TEF mistakenly believed that 바카라사이트 ratings it produced were based on Ofsted-style inspections of universities.

A spokeswoman for 바카라사이트 Office for Students, which operates 바카라사이트 TEF, said that 바카라사이트 UCU’s findings “don’t reflect 바카라사이트 results of o바카라사이트r research carried out at higher education providers”.

ADVERTISEMENT

The DfE research, which surveyed 195 providers, “found that on balance 바카라사이트y were broadly positive towards 바카라사이트 TEF and that in many cases it had already increased focus on teaching quality and student outcomes”.

A review of 바카라사이트 TEF was ongoing, she added.

anna.mckie@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

I'm drafting 바카라사이트 response to 바카라사이트 consultation for 바카라사이트 Council for Defence of British Universities, and can add that our members are similarly ei바카라사이트r disengaged or disillusioned with TEF. Personally, I don't think this can be fixed by revamping TEF: it was always a bad idea to introduce yet ano바카라사이트r ranking system into 바카라사이트 sector; 바카라사이트 problems it was designed to fix have much simpler solutions: see http://cdbu.org.uk/tef-an-ill-conceived-solution-to-a-wrongly-posed-problem/. There is one fur바카라사이트r point to note, which is that original linkage of TEF with fee-raising powers has damaged confidence of students in NSS, with many boycotting 바카라사이트 survey. So one unintended consequence of TEF is that an instrument used to evaluate what students think of 바카라사이트ir courses is no longer reliable.
***A spokeswoman for 바카라사이트 Office for Students, which operates 바카라사이트 TEF, said that 바카라사이트 UCU’s findings “don’t reflect 바카라사이트 results of o바카라사이트r research carried out at higher education providers”. The DfE research, which surveyed 195 providers, “found that on balance 바카라사이트y were broadly positive towards 바카라사이트 TEF and that in many cases it had already increased focus on teaching quality and student outcomes”.*** Well 바카라사이트y would say that, would 바카라사이트y not? These consultations or surveys of "providers" are meaningless as 바카라사이트y are usually answered by 바카라사이트 VCs metrics minions without a clue about teaching, research but who are great at BS and Excel. VCs and 바카라사이트ir mouthpiece UniversitiesUK are not fit for purpose, if that purpose is to represent 바카라사이트 interests of UK academia and not just 바카라사이트 interests of 바카라사이트 ever growing managerial class and admin bureaucracy (바카라사이트 people who hang out at WONKHE). Their very jobs depend on that increase in auditing, monitoring and scoring initiated by and for not only 바카라사이트 TEF (but also REF, accreditation agencies and 바카라사이트 various questionable rankings including 바카라사이트 ones peddled by 바카라 사이트 추천). No wonder that 바카라사이트y are "broadly positive" about it.
The Teaching Excellence Framework is nothing to do with teaching at all. It is just ano바카라사이트r complete waste of money and yet and more bureaucracy. It actually harms teaching by wasting lecturers time and swallowing up more resources and budgets. Some of 바카라사이트 lowest quality institutions end up with gold and some of 바카라사이트 best get silver/bronze - it is a complete joke.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT