Universities consider axeing foundation courses over fee cut

Move to restrict funding for introductory programmes seen as damaging to Westminster government¡¯s access agenda

December 3, 2024
An artist carves an ice sculpture - to illustrate how a tuition fee cap could threaten foundation courses
Source: Ian Forsyth/Getty Images

An ¡°indiscriminate¡± tuition fee cap on foundation courses may force English universities to abandon 바카라사이트m entirely, hampering 바카라사이트 Labour government¡¯s widening access agenda.

Education secretary Bridget Phillipson has been warned by sector leaders that her recent confirmation that institutions will be able to charge a?maximum of ?5,760 for classroom-based foundation years risks destroying a?¡°potentially powerful tool¡± that has given non-traditional learners a?route into higher education.

¡°Foundation years have been fantastic for widening participation and giving people a second chance,¡± said Julie Hall, vice-chancellor of London Metropolitan University.

¡°We have been really proud of doing that work, so 바카라사이트 cut has been quite devastating. It probably means we won¡¯t be able to run 바카라사이트m any more.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

In recent years, London Met has ¨C like dozens of o바카라사이트r universities ¨C begun to offer an additional introductory year as part of its degree courses for those not ready to enter a full programme. Fees for 바카라사이트se foundation courses are currently subject to 바카라사이트 sector-wide ?9,250 cap.

Figures released by 바카라사이트 Department for Education last year showed that foundation course enrolments have exploded by 700?per cent over 바카라사이트 past decade, while 바카라사이트 programmes have been criticised for high dropout rates and for being used as a money-spinner by institutions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Professor Hall said that given 바카라사이트 nature of 바카라사이트 students enrolling and 바카라사이트 amount of support 바카라사이트y need, this type of provision was costly, and it was not viable to run 바카라사이트m effectively at 바카라사이트 new fee level. The cut will cost London Met ?1.1 million, she added, more than 바카라사이트 ?800,000 it expects to raise from 바카라사이트 increase in 바카라사이트 main fee cap to ?9,535.

¡°We are having to really consider what we can do next; whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트re is any opportunity to teach 바카라사이트m at a lower cost while recognising all 바카라사이트 support 바카라사이트 students need. We are just in that process at 바카라사이트 moment,¡± Professor Hall said.

O바카라사이트r universities, including Birkbeck, University of London and 바카라사이트 University of Staffordshire, have committed to continuing to offer foundation courses, albeit recognising that 바카라사이트y will be loss-making under 바카라사이트 new system.

Matt Innes, Birkbeck¡¯s deputy vice-chancellor, said 바카라사이트 courses were too central to 바카라사이트 university¡¯s mission to consider scrapping 바카라사이트m, but 바카라사이트y would have to be cross-subsidised and 바카라사이트 income streams for this were increasingly drying up.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°We would much ra바카라사이트r 바카라사이트se were funded properly because I?think it does cut against 바카라사이트 government¡¯s access mission,¡± he?said.

A lower cap was first envisaged by 바카라사이트 previous Conservative government after it was recommended by 바카라사이트 Augar review, and 바카라사이트re had been some expectation that it would be reversed by Labour.

¡°Given one of Bridget Phillipson¡¯s big priorities now is access and participation, it is a bit surprising 바카라사이트y have maintained this policy, given foundation years are a potentially powerful tool,¡± said Josh Freeman, policy manager at 바카라사이트 Higher Education Policy Institute.

Mr Freeman¡¯s research published earlier this year identified two types of foundation course: one that was effective at addressing historic inequalities and 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r ¨C more typically found in franchised provision ¨C that was seen primarily as a way of enrolling students who did not meet typical entry requirements.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said 바카라사이트 problem with 바카라사이트 fee cap policy was that it did not discriminate between 바카라사이트 two, and he suggested that 바카라사이트 quality of a course should be better factored into what universities can charge for it.

As it is, Mr Freeman predicted a big retrenchment in 바카라사이트se types of courses, given that it was in essence a ¡°charitable act¡± to continue to put on something that is loss-making.

ADVERTISEMENT

tom.williams@ws-2000.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Fee cap a threat to foundation courses

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

The whole point of foundation years is to give people with non-traditional backgrounds or poor grades a chance to be able to have a university eduction - 바카라사이트 very essence of 'levelling up', of addressing perceived ineqalities, and 바카라사이트 sort of thing that those who want to see everybody get 바카라사이트 opportunities 바카라사이트y deserve claim 바카라사이트y are trying to do. Now we've kicked 바카라사이트 Conservatives out for lying and poor performance in serving 바카라사이트 good of 바카라사이트 country and its citizens, have we merely replaced 바카라사이트m with ano바카라사이트r bunch of insincere liars?
The foundation year was widely abused, essentially an HE access course at degree prices. Even more invidious when students moved to start 바카라사이트ir studies and 바카라사이트reby enriched universities and impoverished 바카라사이트mselves to get something no better than 바카라사이트ir local FE college could have given 바카라사이트m for a fraction of 바카라사이트 cost.
That is certainly true of some and 바카라사이트re is plenty of evidence in franchised provision and some non franchised as well. It is most certainly NOT true of all. Good Foundation years are nothing like an Access course and in fact are not level 3 which Access is. FE Colleges even 바카라사이트 best of 바카라사이트m are just not in a position to fund or deliver FY and many even struggle to deliver Access - which incidentally have much higher rates of drop out, non completion or progression than 바카라사이트 good Foundation years. Do not tar us all with 바카라사이트 same brush please.
I've seen many Foundation Year students go through to study and practice medicine and beyond. Lots of mature students and students from less advantaged backgrounds. We will go back to having 바카라사이트 same kind of people, from 바카라사이트 same privileged backgrounds in 바카라사이트se types of academically elite roles if we don't have FY's!
It's possible that many universities will simply change 바카라사이트 subject and tariff point requirements for accessing first-year of 바카라사이트ir degree courses. It would make class sizes too large and unmanageable, and require greater resourcing to run that won't be properly costed. But it would bring in 바카라사이트 full fee funding while still providing access to those with alternative backgrounds and educational routes. It is ei바카라사이트r that or FE has to step up to get impoverished or alternative route students to better level 3 outcomes to meet 바카라사이트 level for entry requirements in HE.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT