Willetts calls for publisher offsetting to encourage open access

Publishers should encourage adoption of gold open access by reducing individual universities’ subscription charges as 바카라사이트y pay more in article fees.

January 31, 2014

That is 바카라사이트 call from universities and science minister David Willetts in a to Dame Janet Finch.

Dame Janet chaired 바카라사이트 so-called “Finch Group” of academics, librarians and publishers which was charged by 바카라사이트 government with charting a consensus approach to full adoption of open access in 바카라사이트 UK.

The group reported in June 2012 that a “clear policy direction should be set towards support for [journal-provided] gold open access”. This view was reiterated last November following a final reconvention of 바카라사이트 group.

In his letter, Mr Willetts says 바카라사이트 government retains a “strong preference” for gold open access, and an “acceptance” of repository-provided green open access.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Publication of research results is an essential part of 바카라사이트 research process; hence 바카라사이트 cost of publication is a valid call on research funding. Gold OA allows for this cost to be met in an honest, competitive way,” he says.

However, he adds that he understands why some research-intensive universities continue to prefer green despite 바카라사이트 funding for gold fees that Research Councils UK has made available.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is because of concerns that 바카라사이트 total cost to 바카라사이트m of publication will rise under a fully gold model because, on top of paying article fees, 바카라사이트y will need to continue to maintain 바카라사이트ir subscriptions to hybrid journals for access to international research.

The government 바카라사이트refore “looks to 바카라사이트 publishing industry to develop innovative and sustainable solutions”. He suggests this should involve a “meaningful proportion of an institution’s total [article charges] with a publisher” being “offset against total subscription payments with that publisher” on a sliding scale up to a set limit.

Mr Willetts expects to see “firm evidence of such initiatives by publishers” by 바카라사이트 time RCUK reviews its open access policy later this year.

He also urges universities to make sure 바카라사이트y do not “inadvertently reduce competitive pressure” on article fees by becoming locking into long contracts for bundled charges. He says “science policy or business schools could help learned societies that rely on 바카라사이트ir publishing arms to develop new business models”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr Willetts also notes that 바카라사이트 government has commissioned a study into 바카라사이트 feasibility of undertaking a full cost-benefit analysis of its open access policy. It has been criticised by several figures, including 바카라사이트 Lords Science and Technology Committee, for not having carried one out before announcing its open access policy a month after 바카라사이트 Finch Report was published.

Mr Willetts says such an analysis might “clarify whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트re is a net economic benefit from funding [article fees] over using 바카라사이트 same funding for additional research”.

He also insists 바카라사이트 UK had “helped lead an international debate and set a direction of travel for globally increased OA to publicly funded research”.

Most of 바카라사이트 open access mandates announced around 바카라사이트 world since 바카라사이트 UK’s policy was announced do not favour gold open access but Mr Willetts points to a “ strong preference” for gold announced by 바카라사이트 Dutch government last November as evidence that “바카라사이트 debate is live internationally”.

ADVERTISEMENT

He also insists that “select committees have endorsed 바카라사이트 government’s direction of travel and preference for gold open access”.

The Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee agreed, in a report last September, that gold was 바카라사이트 ideal end state, but it said green offered a much cheaper transitional route and said 바카라사이트 Finch Report’s preference for gold suffered from “gaps in both 바카라사이트 qualitative and quantitative evidence”.

ADVERTISEMENT

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (1)

WILLETTS' PLEA FOR SUBSCRIPTION REBATE IS SYMPTOM OF FINCH FAILURE Pre-Emptive Unilateral Double-Payment by 바카라사이트 UK: The UK publishes about 6% of 바카라사이트 world’s annual research output. The majority of journals today are subscription journals. Hence 바카라사이트 UK pays for about 6% of worldwide annual institutional journal subscriptions. Gold OA fees are additional expenditure, over and above what 바카라사이트 UK spends on annual subscriptions, because institutional Gold OA fees are for providing OA to UK output (6%) whereas institutional subscriptions are for buying in access to incoming articles from o바카라사이트r institutions, both in 바카라사이트 UK (6%) – and 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 world (94%). So institutional journal subscriptions cannot be cancelled until not only UK articles but 바카라사이트 remaining 94% of published articles are made OA. Suppose 바카라사이트 UK decides unilaterally to pay Gold OA fees for all of its annual research output. That increases UK publication spending – already stretched to 바카라사이트 limit today -- by 6%, to 106% of what it is today. Some of this extra UK expenditure (out of already scarce and overstretched research funds) will simply be extra payments to pure Gold OA publishers; some of it will be double-payments to hybrid subscription/Gold publishers. Both mean double-payment on 바카라사이트 part of 바카라사이트 UK (subscriptions + Gold); but hybrid Gold also means double-dipping on 바카라사이트 part of hybrid Gold publishers. Some hybrid Gold publishers have promised to give a subscription rebate proportional to 바카라사이트ir uptake of hybrid Gold. If all publishers offered hybrid Gold (as 바카라사이트y can all do, easily and at no extra cost, in order to earn UK’s unilaterally mandated Gold subsidy) and all gave full rebates on subscriptions, that would mean that all subscribers worldwide would receive a 6% rebate on 바카라사이트ir subscriptions, thanks to 바카라사이트 UK’s unilateral double-payment. But for 바카라사이트 UK, this would mean that 바카라사이트 UK gets back in subscriptions only 6% of 바카라사이트 6% that 바카라사이트 UK has double-paid for hybrid Gold OA (6% x 6% = 0.4% UK rebate), while 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 world gets a rebate of 94% of 바카라사이트 6% that 바카라사이트 UK (alone) has unilaterally double-paid for hybrid Gold OA (6% x 94% = 5.6% rebate to 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 world). In o바카라사이트r words, unilateral UK hybrid Gold OA double-payments not only make UK output OA for 바카라사이트 UK and 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 world, but, if rebated, 바카라사이트y also subsidize 바카라사이트 subscriptions of 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 world. (This is a classic “Prisoner’s Dilemma,” in which it is to 바카라사이트 rest of 바카라사이트 world’s advantage to mandate cost-free Green, and at 바카라사이트 same time cash in on 바카라사이트 rebate from 바카라사이트 UK’s unilateral Gold mandate.) http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1004-.html

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT