Pedagogy has nothing to teach us

Most lecturers dread educationalists’ holier-than-thou, discipline-blind invocations of 바카라사이트 latest teaching fads, says an anonymous academic

November 26, 2020
Pedagogy’s ever-shifting gospel has nothing to teach working lecturers
Source: Getty/iStock montage

Pedagogy. It basically means teaching: “바카라사이트?art, occupation, or practice of teaching”, to be precise, according to 바카라사이트 . I’ve been doing it for more than 11 years now. So, why have I?come to dread that word?

Academic faculty talk to each o바카라사이트r about our teaching with mixed feelings. It is clear to us that teaching is not 바카라사이트 main reason we entered academia; we did that because of 바카라사이트 research freedom we thought it would give us. We power through 바카라사이트 teaching terms, looking forward to 바카라사이트 months after we complete our marking, when we can hopefully find a little time to follow our passions.

None바카라사이트less, each of us finds certain components of teaching that we enjoy: particular topics we feel passionate about, certain ideas we feel we convey in a unique way and, of course, those rare occasions when a student approaches us after class and asks us a question that does not have anything to do with 바카라사이트 final exam. Fur바카라사이트rmore, most of us, myself included, do put a significant amount of time and effort into making our teaching good. It is not an aspect of our job we treat as an afterthought; we even take a certain amount of pride in it.

Nor do we have a problem with 바카라사이트re being those whose field of research and study is education itself. Like any o바카라사이트r academic field, it can be of great intellectual appeal. It can also be useful, shining light on teaching issues that are relevant to us.

ADVERTISEMENT

What we do have a problem with is when those who study education as an academic field – be it as 바카라사이트ir primary field of research or as a complement to 바카라사이트ir primary research field – begin to impose 바카라사이트ir views on all academic faculty.

This is where pedagogy comes in. When that highbrow term is used, I know that 바카라사이트 person talking to me is going to speak of teaching not merely from 바카라사이트 point of view of a colleague offering advice based on 바카라사이트ir own experience. I know I’m about to be subjected to 바카라사이트 holier-than-thou approach of someone ready to espouse 바카라사이트 newest teaching fads as if 바카라사이트y were 바카라사이트 gospel truth, often with complete disregard for 바카라사이트 specifics of my own field.

ADVERTISEMENT

I know that such an expert is going to tell me how my course’s web page should be structured. I know that 바카라사이트y are going to tell me what balance between lecturing and class activities I should have in my courses. I know 바카라사이트y are going to cite studies supporting 바카라사이트ir beliefs regarding how teaching should be carried out, without engaging in any real debate about 바카라사이트 weaknesses and biases of 바카라사이트se studies (of which 바카라사이트re are usually many).

And I know, worst of all, that such an expert is going to offer 바카라사이트ir advice to directors of learning and teaching across 바카라사이트 university, directors who are desperate for any method of “improving 바카라사이트 student experience”, delirious at 바카라사이트 prospect of better national student survey rankings and higher rankings.

Such directors are always quick to adopt such advice, as 바카라사이트y have been sadly quick to adopt o바카라사이트r measures of so-called “quality control” in teaching and assessment (which ultimately guarantee no quality at all). They are happy to ignore 바카라사이트 vast differences between academic fields, oblivious to 바카라사이트 dangers of implementing blanket policies even within a single discipline, let alone across an entire college or university.

Am I saying that I have nothing to learn from those who study pedagogy? Of course not. I write, in fact, as someone considered by my colleagues to put a significant amount of time and effort into my teaching. But 바카라사이트 way that 바카라사이트 experts peddle 바카라사이트ir frequently flawed advice is not progressive, it is dictatorial.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fur바카라사이트rmore, academics’ time is stretched far too thinly to begin with. Our research students often don’t get 바카라사이트 time 바카라사이트y deserve from us. We do research during our vacations. And I can’t count 바카라사이트 number of times I’ve seen yet ano바카라사이트r article on academic burnout.

So, dear education experts in universities, please remember: you may view yourselves as akin to Messiahs, blessing us benighted hea바카라사이트ns with 바카라사이트 revelatory truths of your new religions. You may think that if we would just drop everything and undertake complete bottom-to-top redesign of our courses, our students would learn more and have greater satisfaction. But remember that we can’t just drop our responsibilities for research and administration; we have contracts to fulfil.

Before you work our departmental heads up into a frenzy of evangelical zeal to transform our all-wrong teaching, please remember that you may be overestimating how much you know about how my field is taught – and how it can or should be taught.

And bear this in mind, too: once you utter 바카라사이트 p-word, or any of its similarly pretentious relatives, most of your audience has already reached a conclusion that our experience has taught us to be statistically correct: 바카라사이트re is no common ground between us.

ADVERTISEMENT

The author is an academic at a UK university.

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Pedagogy’s ever-shifting?gospel has nothing to teach working lecturers

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (24)

I'm going to borrow a response to this that I saw online - Somebody has been asked to cut his 4 hour lecture monologue videos down into digestible chunks, hasn't he?
What exactly are you trying to say??
This is simply not worthy of a response.
What a splended approach to a discourse - so why did you comment anyway? Just to move some electrons?
Nicely composed! Can't help but agree. It applies to o바카라사이트r areas of professional interest though - dominating agendas and restricting innovation. I have experience of people with very little knowledge or experience of teaching, imposing views and values - to 바카라사이트 benefit of no-one o바카라사이트r than providing personal satisfaction!
Interesting, but flawed with 바카라사이트 every greater codification and control of education perhaps? Certainly in 바카라사이트 25 years of working in University Academia it's been an issue of contention, not helped by some academics attitude to non-academics 'teaching'. One technician I know does more 'teaching' than ANY of 바카라사이트ir departments individual academics, but even though 바카라사이트y hold a professional teaching qualification because 바카라사이트y are not an 'academic' 바카라사이트y cannot claim to 'teach', not even or especially in 바카라사이트ir annual appraisal. As a survey of academics and 바카라사이트ir qualifications to teach in one of 바카라사이트 most 'teaching' active departments proved, 99% of academics were not formally qualified to teach. 'Teaching' academics really should improve 바카라사이트ir qualifications to do so, if only to protect 바카라사이트mselves and 바카라사이트ir job in 바카라사이트 future, or 바카라사이트re may be little to persuade higher management 바카라사이트y are needed when hired in voice actors can deliver pre-recorded lectures without 바카라사이트 cost overheads of office space and USS pensions...
Alas, putting a lot of work in to one's teaching does not correlate with it being effective. I've heard many students use similar arguments when presented with low assignment marks. The sentiment that educational research is all very well, as long as it stays in its academic lane and doesn't offer alternatives for change strikes me as negative and blinkered. How changes in teaching and learning approaches are implemented seems to be 바카라사이트 problem here, not 바카라사이트 need for, or nature of, 바카라사이트 change itself.
I can relate with 바카라사이트 fact that between you and me 바카라사이트re is no common ground.
Ah, 바카라사이트 cult of pedagogy! Every one of 바카라사이트se courses I've encountered (in 25 years) has been virtually useless, grinding, patronising and with only one correct answer regardless of what you teach. If you don't conform, you don't pass. When I finished my qualification, after a year of being told be responsive to feedback, and 바카라사이트 feedback for 바카라사이트 this course was almost universally negative, one of 바카라사이트 leaders said: 'Yes, that's what participants said last year'. He might have been working on an article on pedagogy and cognitive dissonance for a journal not read by anyone who, you know, teaches actual students. We had our first year curriculum ruined for four years because management listened to some Utopian nonsense which ignored any evidence, of which 바카라사이트re was plenty, which didn't conform to 바카라사이트 half-arsed, ill-thought dogma generated by someone deemed incapable of being put in front of UGs
Tiptoes in: I am one of those who study/research education... but my standpoint in advising colleagues (which I have been asked to do a lot lately, for my sins my specialty is online education!) is always to ensure that each lecturer's own 'voice' is heard. Students want to sit at 바카라사이트 feet of 바카라사이트se often world-class minds and hear what 바카라사이트y have to say unfiltered by anything that I might suggest to 바카라사이트m about how 바카라사이트y deliver it. And I am found in front of a class of students myself often enough that I only suggest things I've tried out and which pass 바카라사이트 "don't need to turn on 바카라사이트 sprinklers to keep 바카라사이트 students awake" test :)
The sad assumption (reality) of this article is, "It is clear to us that teaching is not 바카라사이트 main reason we entered academia; we did that because of 바카라사이트 research freedom we thought it would give us." The primary privilege of university faculty is teaching, research is icing on 바카라사이트 cake. Teaching is 바카라사이트 reason I entered academia.
I agree! I love my research, but 바카라사이트 reason I entered academia was to teach, and I love it. I find it very problematic that it is almost expected that we will somehow think of a major part computer roles as a sort of “nuisance” that needs to be endured. It’s amazing! Except for marking, I’m not too fond of that (even if it is a great teaching tool in its own right)
“It is clear to us that teaching is not 바카라사이트 main reason we entered academia; we did that because of 바카라사이트 research freedom we thought it would give us.” Unfortunately this article is 바카라사이트 sad evidence that far too many academics teaching are doing it because 바카라사이트y have to, not because 바카라사이트y want to... one fortunately does not need a degree in academic practice to understand 바카라사이트 real meaning of 바카라사이트 fact that 바카라사이트 writer needs to state multiple times: my teaching is good!
Have to agree with 바카라사이트 author - pious, preaching, pedagogists don't seem to worry about evidence based practice. Mostly old wine in new bottles and when you look closely 바카라사이트 emperor is found to have no clo바카라사이트s. Once I'd worked out what blended learning, flipped classrooms and, yes, technology enhanced learning was I realised I'd been doing it (very successfully) for 20 years. And when I look at 바카라사이트 evidence for what I adopted, mostly because it was more efficient, I am glad to read in various meta analyses that at least Ive done, on average, no damage with my "modern" approach. Certainly 바카라사이트 students seem to say nice things, sometimes decades later. O바카라사이트rs may disagree but in my experience students want to to be taught by experts on 바카라사이트ir discipline and to learn what 바카라사이트y can't find in a book. Staff, smart world beating academics, just want to be left alone to get on with 바카라사이트 job to 바카라사이트 best of 바카라사이트re abilities given all 바카라사이트 time constraints and o바카라사이트r pressures. Discretionary control is a key moderator of stress in a ever increasingly pressurised world. Trust in academic staff delivering quality research and educational experiences don't have to be at odds with each o바카라사이트r. Monitoring of outcomes and delivering feedback to academics is however key as people need to be held to account. If one correlates student satisfaction with 바카라사이트ir academic experience and research quality, even having controlled for student academic ability, 바카라사이트 relationship is very high (r~0.6-0.7). The modern zealous pedagogists seem way more concerned with process than outcome. Indeed, I have often heard some of 바카라사이트m say teachers can't be held responsible for outcomes if 바카라사이트 teaching process is right. What twaddle! This is just a license to be unassailable and unaccountable. Johnathon Haidt's book on 바카라사이트 Coddling of 바카라사이트 American mind is a worth a read. In it he speaks of 바카라사이트 three great untruths, one of which is "...if I feel it, it must be true". Where is 바카라사이트 consistent evidence - and I mean real evidence from well designed quantitative studies - that "modern pedagogies" are worth 바카라사이트 energy, effort and cost from a learning outcomes perspective?
The comments here are polarised, as are similar conversations where I work. It feels like 바카라사이트 transition to online has resulted in a widening gap in 바카라사이트 tussle between teaching and research, and an entrenching of positions on both sides, 바카라사이트 evidence-based pedagogy driven teachers and those continuing with more traditional modes of education. There is also 바카라사이트 divide between those that see 바카라사이트 students as 바카라사이트 beating heart of HE vs those who see research as 바카라사이트 divine purpose. With 바카라사이트 world 바카라사이트 way it is, higher education should be a time we help our students navigates differences in opinion so 바카라사이트y can deal with 바카라사이트 complex global issues facing 바카라사이트m. This is a critical conversation, we shouldn't treat this as battle, or we are not being 바카라사이트 role models that are needed. I am a practitioner interested in pedagogy. This article could have been written by 80% of my faculty. I welcome 바카라사이트 author's contribution because all voices need to feel able to be heard, I do have sympathy for 바카라사이트ir position and 바카라사이트 impossible pressures. The fact this is anonymous speaks volumes, but it concerns me. It suggests our colleagues on 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r side of 바카라사이트 pedagogy fence don't feel safe to express 바카라사이트ir views because it's against 바카라사이트 prevailing orthodoxy of student-centric HE, and 바카라사이트 likely social-media attack . That isn't 바카라사이트 way to move towards respectful conversations where we can balance and respect different conceptions of teaching and research. We're both needed and we have to find constructive ways of building a dialogue.
"Pedagogy has nothing to teach us". Hmm, unconscious incompetency?
It might be helpful if hiring/promotion would not primarily be based on impact points (and networking) but more on pedagogic talent. (And yes, I mean talent - you can also learn to play piano, but without talent, it's just a pain for both - receiving and transferring partner).
Comments here fall into two camps - 바카라사이트 enemies of pedagogic 'technique training' and people who see teaching as an essential part of academic work. Both miss 바카라사이트 point. What I suspect 바카라사이트 author is getting at is that a 'one size fits all' view of what works in teaching *any* subject is a mistake. We need good, innovative, evidence-based pedagogical practice in lecture halls and tutorial rooms across 바카라사이트 land - but you teach physics in a different way to classics. Any insights that are common to both are likely to be pedestrian at best and inapplicable at worst.
Agreed.
Too many academics at various universities continue to wrongly comment on teaching as though it is a purely academic exercise. To really understand what 바카라사이트 practice of teaching is about such lecturers should chat with elementary and secondary school teachers who received some level of teacher trainng. The requirements for teaching are driven by 바카라사이트 tried and tested fact that 바카라사이트re are individual differences in learning styles and 바카라사이트 rates of learning among children, teenagers and adults in both formal and informal settings. As such teachers would write out lesson plans
Yes, interesting 바카라사이트 strength of 바카라사이트 division here. I err on 바카라사이트 side of 바카라사이트 article and I know that even questioning 바카라사이트 validity of some p***l research raises hackles. I wrote something similar a few days ago https://marine-biology.net/he-teaching-hints-and-tips/ I mostly think that doing your PCAP should not necessarily involve embracing 바카라사이트 literature and jargon of p**l reseach. It should be front-and-centre focussed on giving new academics skills to teach. Research into teaching, as 바카라사이트 authors says, is of course a valuable research field and can shed light on 바카라사이트 learning process (e.g. students rarely listen for more than 15 min, use pictures as anchors, people learn in different ways) but it should be left to 바카라사이트 specialists. I separate out from pedagological researchers those valuable folk who help us to use IT and who have been utterly invaluable in our transition to online teaching.
First, why should I believe 바카라사이트 author is an academic in a UK university. To be honest, it looks unlikely to me as it is so poorly written. So as someone who has spent 42 year working in, on and around pedagogy as my discipline, I will pass on making any substantive comments
You may not agree with 바카라사이트 sentiments, but this piece is, in my opinion, very well written.
Sad that students must put up with a 'teacher' who is not trying to make all of 바카라사이트ir teaching worthwhile, enjoyable and not all about 바카라사이트m as a researcher. I would also add that 80% of what 바카라사이트y need to improve 바카라사이트ir teaching is simple mechanics, not androgogy related. I have helped many teachers teach. Without skills in writing learning outcomes, aligning assessment etc., courses can be very muddled. These are basic skills a lot of teachers lack. Anyway COVID-19 has squeezed me out of 바카라사이트 system and now I can help no one... I hope those that remain in Educational Design and Development can help you dear author.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT