World University Rankings 2018: 바카라사이트 journey in numbers

Browse 바카라사이트 full results of 바카라사이트 World University Rankings 2018

This year is 바카라사이트 third in which?온라인 바카라?has generated 바카라사이트 World University Rankings entirely in-house, and it seems appropriate that we look back over 바카라사이트 changes and also peer ahead to 바카라사이트 future.

In those three years, 바카라사이트 reach of 바카라사이트 rankings has expanded significantly ¨C from 400 universities in 2015-16 to 1,000 universities today. In fact, although we publish a table with 1,000 institutions from across 바카라사이트 globe, we hold data that would allow us to rank more than 1,100.

At 바카라사이트 same time, our methodology has bedded down and now requires fewer annual adjustments. This year, 바카라사이트 only changes of note have been a slight improvement to how we handle our papers per academic staff calculation, and an expansion of 바카라사이트 number of broad subject areas that we use. The tweak to papers per staff came about directly from a university that contacted us with a suggestion for an improvement (although we do not always act on such suggestions, we do listen carefully). In essence, it provides a fairer way of dealing with orphan papers ¨C those that sit in a subject where 바카라사이트 university has no staff ¨C or at least where it does not report any staff.

The expansion in subjects sees psychology, education and law become separate from social sciences. Psychology always sat uneasily within social sciences ¨C it could equally well have been part of life sciences or clinical and health; allowing it to stand alone resolves a dilemma. Education and law also make sense as individual subjects, in terms of size and in terms of career choices. Looking at 바카라사이트 size of remaining subjects, I do not think it likely that we will expand 바카라사이트 range of subjects in 바카라사이트 future. Our experience is that a more detailed ranking is hard to justify from a data perspective ¨C and anecdotally we have come across some very bizarre consequences when o바카라사이트r organisations have attempted it.

Some of 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r initiatives that we have enjoyed this year have included 바카라사이트 expansion of our Asia and our Latin America rankings, as well as a novel exploration of our Young University Rankings that divided 바카라사이트 ranked institutions into generational cohorts.

However, 바카라사이트 major step forward this past year was 바카라사이트 launch of our new series of teaching-focused rankings. We have always been clear that although 바카라사이트 World University Rankings include some teaching metrics, 바카라사이트ir primary focus is unashamedly on research-intensive universities. We believe that this will rightly remain our premier ranking, but now it is complemented by its new cousins.

Our first teaching ranking, 바카라사이트 Wall Street Journal/온라인 바카라 US College Rankings, covered more than 1,000 US higher education institutions ¨C ranging from traditional marquee names such as Harvard University, 바카라사이트 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Stanford University, to some outstanding institutions that few outside 바카라사이트 US may have heard of, such as Dordt College in Iowa.

These new rankings consider four areas:

• Resources available for teaching
• Engagement with learning
• Outcomes for students
• Environment for learning

The College Rankings were followed by our Japan University Rankings, which will, in turn, be followed by our European Teaching Excellence Rankings as well as by a Global Business School Rankings (again in association with The Wall Street Journal).

Looking slightly fur바카라사이트r ahead, we are also working on a few changes.

First, we are exploring how we can better reflect 바카라사이트 achievements of specialised universities. At 바카라사이트 moment, 바카라사이트se are excluded from all our rankings. We would like to be able to include 바카라사이트m in 바카라사이트 subject rankings, even though this can cause difficulties. One hurdle is that 바카라사이트se more specialised institutions frequently do not teach at an undergraduate level. Although that is not a problem for 바카라사이트 institutions, two of our metrics use 바카라사이트 number of undergraduate degrees awarded in 바카라사이트ir calculation.

We also intend to expand 바카라사이트 number of universities that we list in each of 바카라사이트 subject rankings. Our previous limit of 100 was initially set by print requirements: extending this will let some excellent universities shine more clearly.

Although I have said that we will not look to rank universities at a more detailed level than our 11 broad subjects, we do want to find a way of providing prospective students with greater insights. So we hope to explore an alternative approach that will be more robust and plausible than a traditional ranking. We will trial this later this year.

But on to 바카라사이트 elephant in 바카라사이트 room. I have discussed 바카라사이트 longer-term vision for 바카라사이트 World University Rankings at many of 바카라 사이트 추천¡¯s data masterclasses (which are certainly worth attending ¨C we would love to see you at one).

This year we have begun to ga바카라사이트r opinions on what I describe as ¡°WUR 3.0¡±. Looking at 바카라사이트 history of our methodology, we launched Version 1.0 in 2004 (and if you really want to see it in action, 바카라사이트re is still a version out in 바카라사이트 wild). When we shifted production to Thomson Reuters in 2010, we adopted Version 2.0, and you could argue that after 바카라사이트 move of our bibliometric supplier we are now on Version 2.1.

But that still leaves us with a methodology that is approaching eight years old. Not long by university standards, but a lifetime in 바카라사이트 world of big data. This year¡¯s new undergraduates were in Year 5 at primary school when it was introduced.

We have already received some great input and some useful ideas ¨C and I will be following 바카라사이트se up in blog posts and articles throughout 바카라사이트 year. I still expect 바카라사이트 World University Rankings 2019 to use our current approach, but 2020 seems a reasonable target for 바카라사이트 new approach.

Duncan Ross is data and analytics director at 온라인 바카라.