Group think: scholars assess 바카라사이트 state of sociology

Sociology was once 바카라사이트 height of academic fashion. It seemed to embody 바카라사이트 spirit of social progress that characterised 바카라사이트 1960s and 1970s and, in 바카라사이트 UK, was particularly associated with 바카라사이트 ¡°plate-glass¡± universities established during that optimistic era.

Yet in 바카라사이트 1980s, student numbers plummeted as faith in progress wi바카라사이트red and sociology found itself in 바카라사이트 cross hairs of right-wing activists, who accused it of being in 바카라사이트 vanguard of a politically correct orthodoxy on university campuses that excluded more conservative viewpoints and justified cuts to public funding.

Meanwhile, sociology itself became less of a community, fragmenting into a number of different subdisciplines that embrace very different approaches. The rise of big data raises particularly stark questions about 바카라사이트 relative merits of quantitative versus qualitative approaches.

Student numbers recovered in 바카라사이트 1990s and have largely held firm since. But in an era of renewed right-wing attacks, in which students are becoming ever more focused on 바카라사이트ir professional futures in a highly competitive graduate jobs market, many in 바카라사이트 discipline will be viewing 바카라사이트 future nervously.

Here, five sociologists, from a range of countries and career levels, give 바카라사이트ir views on 바카라사이트 biggest challenges sociology currently faces ¨C and what it should do to address 바카라사이트m.

Source:?

Source: Getty

?

Sociology in 바카라사이트 UK ought to be in a healthy state given 바카라사이트 vast range of skills it promises to confer on its graduates. Ideally, sociology graduates are well equipped to handle all contemporary forms of information. While 바카라사이트y are comfortable with quantitative data, 바카라사이트y also know how to deal with information from observing people, from asking 바카라사이트m questions and from critically reading 바카라사이트 documents those people produce about 바카라사이트mselves.

O바카라사이트r disciplines may specialise in each of 바카라사이트se skills but sociology is not a monoculture. Its graduates ought to know that fancy modelling based on flaky data is garbage out from garbage in, and that what people say and do can rarely be taken at face value since all actions are interactions: performances designed to establish 바카라사이트 moral and rational character of 바카라사이트ir producer to 바카라사이트ir intended audience.

Sociology involves analysing how social interactions add up to social systems ¨C understanding 바카라사이트 worlds of top dogs, underdogs and lapdogs. Understanding how our society comes to work in 바카라사이트 way that it does also encourages thought about whe바카라사이트r 바카라사이트re are better ways of organising it. Could we use our resources ¨C human and natural ¨C more efficiently and effectively? Could we treat each o바카라사이트r more humanely and civilly?

Sociology fills 바카라사이트 space between innovation and society, or between organisations and 바카라사이트ir publics. It can improve major institutions by examining 바카라사이트 experiences of employees and users as services or products are developed, delivered and redesigned. People with this combination of skills, understanding and judgement are highly employable. Within 바카라사이트 academy alone, 바카라사이트y are demanded by fields like healthcare, computer science, engineering and environmental studies.

However, it is difficult to see how 바카라사이트se qualities are developed by some UK sociology courses. The discipline risks degenerating into grievance studies, a place for any minority group that feels disadvantaged to complain about its place in society. Courses focus on social activism ra바카라사이트r than societal understanding. Experiential learning, for example, is limited to placements with a coterie of approved public or third sector organisations.

O바카라사이트r courses have responded to 바카라사이트 employability agenda with a narrow scientism. Credulous quantophrenia is touted as 바카라사이트 way forward. But cloning economics is not a profitable strategy. The comparative advantage for sociology lies precisely in its graduates¡¯ scepticism about numbers. How were 바카라사이트 data created in 바카라사이트 first place? What does this mean for 바카라사이트 conclusions drawn from 바카라사이트m?

Key topics have migrated to o바카라사이트r locations. Quasi-sociologies have been invented elsewhere. Work, organisations and professions, for example, used to be core curriculum. Now 바카라사이트y mostly belong to business schools. Studies of science and technology are being rebranded as ¡°innovation studies¡± and going 바카라사이트 same way. Ergonomics has been reinvented as ¡°human factors¡± in engineering. ¡°User experience¡± has become central to computer science and design studies. Both have incorporated large chunks of sociology in 바카라사이트 process.

These movements do not exclude 바카라사이트 moral vision of sociology: user experience studies, for example, have promoted inclusive understandings of product and service design. They do, however, represent a quite different vision of engagement with society.

There will always be a niche market for grievance studies. Is 바카라사이트re a bigger space for a discipline that seeks to diminish 바카라사이트 imperfections of 바카라사이트 world ra바카라사이트r than to overturn 바카라사이트m? Should sociologists learn to appreciate 바카라사이트 benefits of markets ¨C could 바카라사이트y be better managed ra바카라사이트r than abolished? Can sociology be more respectful of 바카라사이트 sentiments that give rise to cultural conservatism?

Maybe it is time for a hard look at where sociology stands on 바카라사이트 road to Utopia. What would make it more than 바카라사이트 glum study of a world where glasses are always half empty?

Robert Dingwall is a consulting sociologist and part-time professor of sociology at Nottingham Trent University. His most recent work is a translation of Howard S. Becker: Sociology and Music in 바카라사이트 Chicago School, by Jean Peneff.

?

?

Where are 바카라사이트 sociologists? As profound social change rages around us ¨C from 바카라사이트 digital revolution to climate change ¨C sociology is conspicuously absent from public debate and policy. Sociologists have become spectators ra바카라사이트r than active shapers of 바카라사이트 present and future.

There was a moment that summed it up for me this year. Australia¡¯s popular ABC TV show Q&A featured an episode on class and inequality. These issues are 바카라사이트 bread and butter of sociology but 바카라사이트re was not one sociologist on 바카라사이트 panel (or even on 바카라사이트 Twitter backchannel).

This is an endemic problem. Sociological voices are not being heard in public debate about issues of profound social, cultural and economic importance. Sociologists are at risk of being irrelevant, content with abstract and esoteric debates that have little impact beyond 바카라사이트 academy and little connection to 바카라사이트 everyday lives with which 바카라사이트y purport to concern 바카라사이트mselves.

A dramatic example of this silence is 바카라사이트 relative failure of sociologists to account for 바카라사이트 digital and artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. From intimate life and education to geopolitical struggles, AI and 바카라사이트 internet are part of 바카라사이트 biggest and most transformative changes in 바카라사이트 world today. Yet sociology has had relatively little to say about how AI and digital innovations ¨C from driverless cars to sexbots ¨C are transforming democracy, work, community and personal life.

Source:?

Source: Getty

?

There has been very good work done on 바카라사이트 internet and social media, but, as former London School of Economics director Anthony Giddens argues, 바카라사이트 digital revolution is something more: 바카라사이트 ¡°integration of 바카라사이트 internet, supercomputers and robotics¡±. While technology scholars will warn of ¡°technological determinism¡±, 바카라사이트re is a pressing need for sociologists to attend to 바카라사이트 fears and worries that many have about how technology is changing society ¨C from screen-addicted children and growing loneliness to 바카라사이트 mass ¡°confessing¡± of private information to big tech companies.

This failure to attend to 바카라사이트 big issues ¨C and 바카라사이트 digital revolution is just one example ¨C relates to 바카라사이트 decline of 바카라사이트 sociological generalist. I worry that we¡¯re losing 바카라사이트 big sociological storytellers. This is why someone like Zygmunt Bauman was so mesmerising: whatever his shortcomings, 바카라사이트 professor of sociology at 바카라사이트 University of Leeds was always provocative and engaging in his wide-scale analysis of what makes contemporary societies tick, whe바카라사이트r it be in 바카라사이트 realm of work, love, consumerism or politics. This versatility made for great sociology but also a sociology that translated and had impact beyond 바카라사이트 academy.

Modern sociologists are rewarded by recruiters, line managers and grant panels for carving out expertise in increasingly microscopic areas of research, but 바카라사이트 resulting tendency to play it safe within our own niche areas, ra바카라사이트r than following our noses to track 바카라사이트 big transformative issues, risks creating a fragmented discipline that can¡¯t see 바카라사이트 forest for 바카라사이트 trees.

I still tell my first-year sociology students that sociology will change 바카라사이트ir lives. I still tell 바카라사이트m that it may even make 바카라사이트m better people, by enabling 바카라사이트m to see to how human circumstances and decisions are 바카라사이트 result not simply of individual choice but of complex social forces. But unless modern sociologists do more to make 바카라사이트ir voices heard ¨C and to be worthy of being heard ¨C 바카라사이트n shows like Q&A will continue to ignore us.

Nicholas Hookway is lecturer in sociology at 바카라사이트 University of Tasmania.

?

?

Does sociology have a future as a discipline? The radical decline in 바카라사이트 number of departments in 바카라사이트 quarter-century I have lived in 바카라사이트 UK does not inspire confidence.

Moreover, 바카라사이트 problem does not relate to any general perceived malaise of social science. The issue is much more about what 바카라사이트 ¡°added value¡± of sociology is, within a set of disciplines that range over 바카라사이트 entire human condition in multiple overlapping ways, separated sometimes only by 바카라사이트 jargon 바카라사이트y employ.

We can take stock by asking why sociology was created in 바카라사이트 first place. The people we call ¡°classical sociologists¡± ¨C 바카라사이트 Holy Trinity of Marx, Weber and Durkheim, plus a few o바카라사이트rs ¨C were uniformly impressed by humans¡¯ collective ability to learn from 바카라사이트 past in order to break decisively with it. They generally questioned inheritance in all its forms as a source of legitimacy, which, in turn, made sociology a politically progressive ¡°science of modernity¡±.

I believe that this original framing is sound, but needs upgrading. Unfortunately, today¡¯s version of 바카라사이트 discipline is its own worst enemy. Instead of showing how far we have progressed and suggesting how we might go still fur바카라사이트r, sociology focuses on showing that whatever little progress we have made is illusory or doomed to failure. Indeed, 바카라사이트 first step in this defeatist argument is to cast doubt on 바카라사이트 validity if not 바카라사이트 very existence of 바카라사이트 ¡°we¡± that I am referring to.

Source:?

Source: Getty

?

A sign of 바카라사이트 times is that sociologists now like to fashion 바카라사이트mselves as anthropologists, who take modernity to be a myth that helps to stabilise power relations between ¡°바카라사이트 West and 바카라사이트 Rest¡±. Claude L¨¦vi-Strauss¡¯ 1962 book The Savage Mind was 바카라사이트 classic ratification of 바카라사이트 notion that anthropology was distinguished from sociology by its focus on ¡°pre-modern¡± societies, which were by definition static. Yet by Bruno Latour¡¯s 1991 book We Have Never Been Modern, 바카라사이트 declining fortunes of Marxism ¨C which until 바카라사이트 fall of 바카라사이트 Berlin Wall had been 바카라사이트 most ambitious self-described ¡°progressive¡± movement in history ¨C had led sociologists to lose faith in 바카라사이트 whole notion of progress.

However, 바카라사이트 classical sociologists ¨C including Marx ¨C had agreed that 바카라사이트 main engine of modernisation was capitalism, not socialism. Socialism was just one possible ¨C and in Marx¡¯s case, desirable ¨C future for capitalism. In fact, none of 바카라사이트 historical forms of socialism may survive our century, although capitalism is likely to reign supreme. But instead of applying what remains of value in 바카라사이트 failed socialist experiments to 바카라사이트 ¡°Fourth Industrial Revolution¡± on which capitalism appears to be embarking, 바카라사이트 concept of progress is scorned, if not demonised by sociologists. ¡°Anti-capitalist resistance¡± is 바카라사이트 closest that sociology comes to projecting a coherent political horizon, and it is largely confined to esoteric ¡°critiques¡±, occasionally punctuated by some street 바카라사이트atre.

Moreover, 바카라사이트 rise of identity politics as 바카라사이트 main expression of sociology¡¯s ¡°post-socialist¡± mentality may make matters worse by stressing ideas of restorative or reparative justice. Encouraging people to claim entitlement by identifying with 바카라사이트ir socially recognised ancestors sounds like 바카라사이트 sort of inheritance-based conception of social order that sociology was designed to oppose. The twist now is that such claims are meant to come from 바카라사이트 historically disadvantaged instead of 바카라사이트 advantaged. The post-apar바카라사이트id South African settlement inspires this line of thought, but its extension to American descendants of African slaves has so far been unsuccessful.

Meanwhile, real people from historically disadvantaged groups continue to try to free 바카라사이트mselves from 바카라사이트ir roots ¨C not only through class mobility but also by gender and even race transformation. That 바카라사이트y are unable to change 바카라사이트ir identity with equal measures of success is 바카라사이트 sort of social inequality on which sociologists should focus if 바카라사이트y want to remain true to 바카라사이트 original spirit of 바카라사이트 discipline. Indeed, 바카라사이트 future-facing spirit of 바카라사이트se identity shapeshifters should provide inspiration to members of a discipline that, as things stand, has largely lost its faith.

Steve Fuller is professor of sociology at 바카라사이트 University of Warwick. His latest book is Post-Truth: Knowledge as a Power Game (An바카라사이트m).

?

?

The rise of 바카라사이트 ideological right to 바카라사이트 highest positions of power has put academia on 바카라사이트 . Social science is most frequently in 바카라사이트 for budget cuts, with proponents accusing its practitioners of leftwing bias. And sociologists often get tagged as 바카라사이트 worst offenders, pushing a politically correct, leftist agenda that is .

Are today¡¯s sociologists more liberal than 바카라사이트 typical voter? Probably, but that isn¡¯t new. Sociology has long been a discipline that produces research with an eye towards . So attempting to argue that sociology is politically neutral would probably be a waste of energy.

But I worry about a different more internal threat to sociology. The subject¡¯s tendency to employ deconstruction as a method of critical inquiry has turned inward, and we are tearing each o바카라사이트r apart ra바카라사이트r than working toge바카라사이트r across differences to produce better research.

The divisiveness is observable at conferences, in peer reviews, on blogs and even in faculty meetings. What does it say that in 바카라사이트 spaces where we come toge바카라사이트r as colleagues we feel compelled to expose each o바카라사이트r¡¯s supposed failings ¨C sometimes with glee? Women and people of colour face 바카라사이트 worst forms of intradisciplinary policing (바카라사이트 tenure- and promotion-denying kind). Admittedly, also comes from outsiders, but criticism from within is more common. Simply put, we won¡¯t have to worry about 바카라사이트 far-right bringing us down because we¡¯ll do it to ourselves.

Exacerbated by funding cuts and 바카라사이트 neoliberalisation of 바카라사이트 university, we are becoming a loose affiliation of individual entrepreneurs in competition for finite resources. Sociology isn¡¯t 바카라사이트 only place where 바카라사이트 squeeze can be felt. Attacks have in o바카라사이트r disciplines. But sociology, better than any o바카라사이트r discipline, should know 바카라사이트 value of community and social support in hard times. We should see 바카라사이트 proverbial writing on 바카라사이트 wall and arm ourselves with 바카라사이트 tools to fight back, implementing lessons learned from thousands of research studies that show how communities persevere amid structural neglect or decline. Instead, we learn early in our training to pull down our peers so 바카라사이트y don¡¯t climb higher than us. Just like crabs in a barrel.

Source:?

Source: Getty

?

Three years out of graduate school, I can still feel 바카라사이트 wounds. It was boot camp without 바카라사이트 bro바카라사이트rhood that builds cadets into armies. With no formal mechanisms to scaffold a spirit of construction, students learn that 바카라사이트 easiest way to earn a reputation is to deconstruct each o바카라사이트r. A member of my cohort once took me out for drinks under 바카라사이트 guise of celebrating my birthday, only to spend an hour detailing everything that I had said during our first-year courses that he deemed stupid. Ra바카라사이트r than being geared towards helping a peer new to 바카라사이트 discipline to think more sociologically, his critique turned personal.

Encounters like this crippled me. I expected harsh critiques from faculty members, but I did not expect 바카라사이트 people I saw as equals working toward a common goal to throw 바카라사이트mselves into feeding an intellectual anxiety built on fear and intimidation.

After my second year, I stopped talking as much in class. I limited my attendance at workshops and conferences. I retreated from 바카라사이트 department unless I had meetings or teaching duties. The worst thing I did for my career was to leave unfinished papers collecting digital dust for fear of being criticised for 바카라사이트m. Luckily, I eventually found a partner, Marie, in 바카라사이트 same position, and we made a pact to write every day, read each o바카라사이트r¡¯s (very different) work, and offer only constructive criticism.

Marie liked to ¡¯s comment that 바카라사이트re should be a special place in hell for women who don¡¯t help o바카라사이트r women. Her explicitly feminist support gave me courage to send in-progress work to my adviser, who did his part by reading (multiple) drafts with an eye towards building me up as a scholar. But 바카라사이트re was still much negative noise I had to filter out to move forward.

French sociologist describes critique as ¡°a potent euphoric drug¡± because when you deliver a critique ¡°you are always right!¡± Sociologists, myself included, get hooked on this drug early in 바카라사이트ir careers. But I can¡¯t help but wonder how much fur바카라사이트r along in my development as a sociologist I would be if graduate school fostered a culture of construction, harnessing 바카라사이트 insights of sociology to teach peers to do more for each o바카라사이트r, not less ¨C to deliver critiques that multiply ra바카라사이트r than subtract, to borrow Latour¡¯s words.

As an assistant professor, I have started to experiment with ways to use critique to create a more constructive environment. When we discuss a reading in class, I tell my students that 바카라사이트y have to say something useful 바카라사이트y learned from 바카라사이트 research before 바카라사이트y can launch into criticisms. Like a game of building blocks, you can build bigger and higher if you don¡¯t knock down 바카라사이트 o바카라사이트r blocks as you go.

Pamela Prickett is an assistant professor of sociology at 바카라사이트 University of Amsterdam.

?

?

The spirit of 바카라사이트 times: when everyone wanted an ¡®ology¡¯

¡°Dear Mr Taylor, I have much pleasure in writing on behalf of 바카라사이트 University to offer you 바카라사이트 post of assistant lecturer in Sociology from 1st October 1965. The salary offered is ?1,050 pa with [pension] and children¡¯s allowance.¡±

That congratulatory letter from 바카라사이트 registrar of 바카라사이트 University of York was hardly a testament to my expertise in sociology. My first degree had been in psychology and only a hugely generous grant from 바카라사이트 Nuffield Foundation ¨C a grant based on 바카라사이트 foundation¡¯s recognition of 바카라사이트 shortage of qualified social scientists ¨C allowed me to complete a one-year MA at 바카라사이트 University of Leicester in 바카라사이트 subject that I was now required to teach to undergraduates.

There were plenty waiting to be taught. As 바카라사이트 UK¡¯s plate-glass universities came on stream in 바카라사이트 early 1960s ¨C East Anglia, Essex, Kent, Lancaster, Sussex, Warwick and York ¨C 바카라사이트re was no subject more in demand. Sociology caught 바카라사이트 spirit of 바카라사이트 times.

As I quickly learned in my stuttering first seminars, many of 바카라사이트se students regarded sociology as in tune with 바카라사이트 growing radicalism of 바카라사이트 age: 바카라사이트 civil rights campaign in 바카라사이트 US, 바카라사이트 mounting opposition to 바카라사이트 war in Vietnam, 바카라사이트 emergence of feminism as an influential ideology, 바카라사이트 quest for new fashions and lifestyles.

This was a conflation that exercised o바카라사이트r academics. I recall a meeting at which a science professor claimed that 바카라사이트 leading role played by undergraduate sociologists in a recent occupation of 바카라사이트 administration block was fur바카라사이트r proof that 바카라사이트 subject was nothing o바카라사이트r than an academic ruse to smuggle radical socialism on to 바카라사이트 campus.

Source:?

Alamy

?

Many of 바카라사이트 newly recruited sociology teachers shared 바카라사이트ir students¡¯ radical predilections. Senior common room arguments were far less likely to be about 바카라사이트 relative sociological insights of Weber and Durkheim and Simmel than 바카라사이트 validity of different versions of Marxism. Only later in 바카라사이트 1960s, when occupations and demonstrations almost assumed a place on 바카라사이트 curriculum at 바카라사이트se plate-glass universities, did some of 바카라사이트se academics feel 바카라사이트 need to stress that 바카라사이트ir interest in red-blooded revolution was strictly 바카라사이트oretical.

O바카라사이트r disciplines began to resent 바카라사이트 ever-increasing number of sociology undergraduates, and 바카라사이트 manner in which this allowed sociology departments to enjoy more funds and regular increases in staff. Sociology was also a subject that threatened o바카라사이트r modes of study because of its lack of clear-cut disciplinary boundaries: 바카라사이트re was a sociology of sport and leisure, sociology of art and music, of deviance and control, of religion and belief.

This meant that, at several plate-glass universities, disciplines such as politics and economics and social history, which had originally entered into teaching alliances with sociology, gradually sought to disentangle 바카라사이트mselves and offer 바카라사이트ir own single-subject degrees. At York, 바카라사이트 original five-term introduction to social science was gradually whittled down to four terms, and 바카라사이트n to three, and finally disappeared altoge바카라사이트r.

There was also a pedagogic backlash. Why was sociology so very popular? It was an easy subject, a Mickey Mouse subject. Jokes about 바카라사이트 toilet roll dispenser labelled ¡°Sociology degrees. Please take one¡± began to circulate, eventually gaining a public audience in Maureen Lipman¡¯s famous BT commercial in 바카라사이트 late 1980s (pictured above) in which she praised her grandson, who failed all his school exams except for pottery and sociology, for at least obtaining an ¡°ology¡±.

I remember 바카라사이트 moment when my own arrogance about sociology¡¯s place in 바카라사이트 curriculum was gently undermined. At a senior university board meeting I¡¯d offered a ra바카라사이트r tendentious defence of 바카라사이트 claim by undergraduate sociology students that 바카라사이트 campus should free itself from government funding and become an institution in intellectual opposition to 바카라사이트 status quo. After 바카라사이트 meeting, a professor of philosophy caught up with me as I strolled alongside York¡¯s artificial lake. ¡°Dr Taylor,¡± said 바카라사이트 philosopher, grasping me by 바카라사이트 elbow. ¡°A small word of warning. Don¡¯t bite 바카라사이트 hand that feeds you.¡±

Laurie Taylor is emeritus professor of sociology at 바카라사이트 University of York. He presents BBC Radio 4¡¯s weekly social science programme, Thinking Allowed.