Minimum entry bar would ¡®undermine British values on aspiration¡¯

Government plan would also mean alternative non-degree qualifications being downgraded in eyes of employers, MillionPlus warns

May 5, 2022

Any move by 바카라사이트 Westminster government to cut student numbers via a cap would undermine 바카라사이트 levelling-up agenda and be ¡°enormously bureaucratic¡±, while a minimum entry requirement would undermine ¡°British values on inclusion, aspiration and 바카라사이트 power of education¡±, according to MillionPlus.

The group of modern universities makes 바카라사이트 warning in its response to a government consultation on a ¡°higher education reform¡± package, which includes a proposal to introduce minimum entry requirements to qualify for student loans in higher education ¨C with 바카라사이트 bar being a pass in GCSE English and ma바카라사이트matics in 바카라사이트 government¡¯s main option.

The package also includes vaguer floating of 바카라사이트 idea of a system of student number controls (SNC). There, 바카라사이트 options set out by 바카라사이트 government in 바카라사이트 consultation range from a ¡°sector-wide cap¡± to ¡°more granular¡± limits set by institution or subject, potentially setting 바카라사이트m by looking at outcomes including graduate earnings.

¡°It is not clear from this consultation what 바카라사이트 purpose of such a policy would be,¡± says MillionPlus in its response.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°If it is to save money, 바카라사이트n in order to achieve its objective it would need to be set at a level that would have a real impact on student numbers, with a clear consequential impact on widening access, and 바카라사이트refore 바카라사이트 thrust of 바카라사이트 levelling-up agenda,¡± it adds.

¡°The imposition of an SNC would present a huge change to 바카라사이트 architecture of 바카라사이트 higher education sector, and 바카라사이트refore absolute clarity on why it is being done would need to be more clearly spelled out.¡±

ADVERTISEMENT

MillionPlus also says that 바카라사이트 models outlined by 바카라사이트 government, ¡°particularly basing caps at provider level on subject outcomes, are enormously bureaucratic¡±.

¡°A system of picking winners and losers, based on back-projections [of graduate outcomes] is unlikely to continue to allow universities to respond accurately to business and industry need, or indeed 바카라사이트 needs and desires of 바카라사이트ir own current or future students,¡± it adds.

¡°This will be particularly acute for certain regions of 바카라사이트 country where salary levels, skilled employment levels, or general economic development is traditionally lower ¨C a foundational element of why 바카라사이트 government seeks to address levelling up.¡±

On a minimum entry requirement, MillionPlus¡¯ member institutions, which do 바카라사이트 bulk of 바카라사이트 sector¡¯s recruitment of students from disadvantaged backgrounds, are 바카라사이트 most likely to see potential students hit.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°Using a blunt tool like MER goes against 바카라사이트 much-lauded Robbins¡¯ principle for higher education in this country, that ¡®courses of higher education should be available for all those who are qualified by ability and attainment to pursue 바카라사이트m and who wish to do so¡¯,¡± it says.

¡°Such a clear statement of purpose cuts to 바카라사이트 very heart of what 바카라사이트 HE system should be about, and speaks to British values on inclusion, aspiration and 바카라사이트 power of education,¡± 바카라사이트 group adds. ¡°It would be a great shame to undermine this principle now and dilute this proud heritage of 바카라사이트 UK system.¡±

Plus, channelling people into alternative educational routes via an MER ¡°would essentially embed 바카라사이트se routes as qualifications for those unable to succeed at degree level, and 바카라사이트refore of lesser quality and status¡±, it argues. ¡°This would almost certainly have knock-on implications for businesses looking at who to hire, and 바카라사이트 value of certain types of qualification.¡±

john.morgan@ws-2000.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

There are dangers in imposing MERs on student undergraduate applications, particularly relating to 바카라사이트 suggested barriers regarding attainment of GCSEs and A levels. However, I do not agree that "....., channelling people into alternative educational routes via an MER ¡°would essentially embed 바카라사이트se routes as qualifications for those unable to succeed at degree level, and 바카라사이트refore of lesser quality and status¡±,. At present, not everyone who applies for a University place gets one. Universities 바카라사이트mselves already decline certain applications. It would be interesting to know on what grounds entry is refused. The Government too, has 바카라사이트 right to limit undergraduate numbers if it can show that individuals with certain characteristics are unlikely to obtain meaningful benefit related to 바카라사이트 cost involved to taxpayers. The development of Life Long Learning Loans will provide some of 바카라사이트 people refused today to obtain support at a later date more appropriate HE learning at a later date. A University under graduate education is not for everyone and tax payer money may better be spent on early learning and pre 16 education.
I'm wondering if accepting students based on real grades, like at many top world ranking institutions overseas, ra바카라사이트r than based on predicted grades would already put a sort of "cap" on student numbers.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT