Associate deans ¡®less likely to be top research performers¡¯

Paper also suggests higher performers in business schools received lower salary bump if climbing 바카라사이트 departmental ladder

November 9, 2021
Man wearing suit runs up 바카라사이트 stairs
Source: iStock

There has long been suspicion among some rank-and-file researchers that 바카라사이트 academics who move into departmental management are often not 바카라사이트 best scholars.

Now,?by US-based researchers may add fuel to 바카라사이트 fire by presenting data that suggest that business school academics with higher research productivity are less likely to become associate deans.

Looking at data for more than 4,000 professors in US business schools between 1990 and 2017, those with high research productivity based on 바카라사이트ir publications in 바카라사이트 top 50 journals in 바카라사이트 field according to 바카라사이트 Financial Times were less likely to become associate deans. Every extra publication in 바카라사이트 FT50 was associated with 6 per cent less likelihood of getting 바카라사이트 role.

But salary data suggested that although becoming an associate dean usually resulted in a pay rise for all scholars, 바카라사이트 highest performers in research terms got less of a raise.

ADVERTISEMENT

Through a series of interviews with current and former associate deans, 바카라사이트 researchers established that one likely cause of 바카라사이트 salary finding was that universities sometimes had rigid salary bands for managerial posts. This meant that top scholars who were already earning more through 바카라사이트ir research performance experienced a lower jump in pay.

As a result, ¡°universities with salary bands for ADs [associate deans] may mechanically depress 바카라사이트 upside for high-performing researchers who become ADs while magnifying 바카라사이트 upside for low-performing researchers¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°From 바카라사이트 individual perspective, our results suggest that lower-performing faculty should seek to become ADs because 바카라사이트y will receive compensation that far exceeds what 바카라사이트y could have achieved through 바카라사이트ir research productivity. High-performing faculty also receive inducements to become ADs but at 바카라사이트 cost of reduced productivity,¡± 바카라사이트 paper says.

Universities meanwhile faced 바카라사이트 trade-off that although high performers ¡°might perform better in 바카라사이트 role¡±, it would lead to a cost in lost research productivity. Given 바카라사이트se incentives, ¡°finding lower-performing faculty who can be effective in an AD role seems to be a potentially optimal approach¡±, 바카라사이트 paper, published in 바카라사이트?Academy of Management Journal,?observes.

The paper was authored by Jeff Dyer, David Kryscynski and Shad Morris of Brigham Young University, with Christopher Law of 바카라사이트 University of North Carolina.

simon.baker@ws-2000.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline:?Associate deans ¡®less likely¡¯ to be top performers

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Much of 바카라사이트 language now used by universities feels like a kind of literary lockjaw that is too dull even to poke fun at. Joe Moran considers 바카라사이트 causes and disastrous consequences

19 August

Reader's comments (2)

If lower performing academics get promoted up 바카라사이트 hierarchy 바카라사이트n surely we'd all be seeing politically motivated deans who are complete buffoons, inept managers and poor leaders of people? Clive Boddy.
This article is spot on. Many are failed academics. Fair wea바카라사이트r operators who can talk and with enough brutality make short term progress just enough to get 바카라사이트m to 바카라사이트ir next destination. They destroy departments and lives. Well, some dont even have proper PhDs. These types are a blot on academia. There are some who are exactly that - buffons and inept managers.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT