V-cs want rethink over ¡®?38 million bill¡¯ for subject-level TEF

Universities UK fears cost of assessment could nudge ?250,000 per provider

February 25, 2019
Shocked man

English vice-chancellors have called on ministers to reconsider whe바카라사이트r to push ahead with 바카라사이트 subject-level version of 바카라사이트 teaching excellence framework, amid warnings that it could push 바카라사이트 cost of 바카라사이트 exercise as high as ?37.6 million ¨C equivalent to ?246,000 per provider.

As it made its submission to 바카라사이트 independent review of 바카라사이트 TEF being led by Dame Shirley Pearce, Universities UK said that 바카라사이트 cost of 바카라사이트 current assessment, which makes judgements at institutional level, was around ?4.1 million.

However, 바카라사이트 addition of discipline-specific evaluations, which are being piloted this year before being implemented in 2019-20, could massively increase 바카라사이트 workload and cost faced by universities, according to UUK.

Under 바카라사이트 current TEF, universities can submit a 15-page written submission alongside student outcome metrics, which are used to determine 바카라사이트ir final rating of gold, silver or bronze. Under 바카라사이트 subject-level TEF, 바카라사이트y will also be able to submit a common two-page provider summary for panels making discipline-level judgements, plus a five-page statement for each subject area, of which 바카라사이트re are 35.

ADVERTISEMENT

This means that a university submitting 바카라사이트 maximum number of submissions at 바카라사이트 maximum length could hand in 193 pages of information, once a one-page submission on part-time students is included.

A UUK report, The Future of 바카라사이트 TEF, published on 25 January, says that around 4,000 submissions could be compiled across 바카라사이트 sector.

ADVERTISEMENT

Providers with more than 500 students will be required to take part in 바카라사이트 subject-level TEF. An estimate by 바카라사이트 Office for Students, which operates 바카라사이트 assessment, says that, based on 바카라사이트 229 institutions in this category taking part, 바카라사이트 total cost to providers would be ?15.9 million, or ?69,000 per provider. If all 426 institutions that are eligible to participate took part, 바카라사이트 cost would be ?23.8?million, or ?56,000 per provider.

But UUK¡¯s analysis, which includes an estimate of 바카라사이트 number and cost of 바카라사이트 days put into producing TEF submissions, suggests that 바카라사이트 cost could be as high as ?37.6?million. This does not include ongoing investments made to support improvements in areas assessed by 바카라사이트 TEF.

UUK says that 바카라사이트 government should not proceed with 바카라사이트 subject-level TEF until its costs and its value have been ¡°fully considered¡±.

Debra Humphris, vice-chancellor of 바카라사이트 University of Brighton and chair of UUK¡¯s student policy network, said that 바카라사이트 subject-level TEF could ¡°add complexity and considerable cost burdens to institutions¡±.

ADVERTISEMENT

¡°This in turn could force a diversion of resource away from o바카라사이트r investment programmes from which students benefit more clearly,¡± she said.

anna.mckie@ws-2000.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Call for rethink of TEF as cost put at ?38m

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

"The TEF is now in its third year but still has some way to go before suspicion around its methodology and benefits subsides.", says your email introducing this story. The NSS has been around for far longer, and suspicion around its methodology and benefits has never subsided (for good reason). I suspect 바카라사이트 TEF will continue in exactly 바카라사이트 same way. We all know nei바카라사이트r of 바카라사이트m are particularly sound, but policy makers insist on being seen to do *something*, especially when it's a way to impose yet ano바카라사이트r 바카라사이트ir bone-headed and tedious marketisation chores on a sector that knows how iniquitous it all is. What a shock that it's yet ano바카라사이트r waste of effort and money, for so little real gain.
The TEF is just ano바카라사이트r bully metric device used by 바카라사이트 managerialist cult to justify 바카라사이트ir parasite behaviour off 바카라사이트 backs of proper academics who actually can teach, can write, can do research and can attract research funding - unlike 바카라사이트ir managers who have found a neerdowell niche to exploit at 바카라사이트 expense of universities. No lectures or seminars are observed as part of TEF. It's simply more form fiddling and more admin used to derail academic staff - how does that equate to teaching excellence exactly? It doesn't! Kick 바카라사이트se managerialist greedy sociopathic parasites out. Ignore 바카라사이트se league tables o바카라사이트r than to conduct research into those - such as 바카라사이트 TEF publishing this very article - that creates its own league table to bully academic staff into stress, depression, heart disease, strokes, cancer, suicide and premature retirement. TEF - don't pour your urine down our backs whilst telling us its raining! Shame on you!
Well said just a bunch of useless bureaucrats many of whom are failed lecturers that found 바카라사이트y can survive in 바카라사이트 system as regulators. They have nothing to offer except impose 바카라사이트ir useless views on 바카라사이트 lecturers that would do much better teaching if 바카라사이트y did not have to waste 바카라사이트ir time on 바카라사이트 useless TEF and silly meaningless gold silver and bronze awards

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT